2013
DOI: 10.1673/031.013.4301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-Evolution in Grasshoppers Mediated by Polymorphic Robertsonian Translocations

Abstract: This review focuses on grasshoppers that are polymorphic for Robertsonian translocations because in these organisms the clarity of meiotic figures allows the study of both chiasma distribution and the orientation of trivalents and multivalents in metaphase I. Only five species of such grasshoppers were found in the literature, and all of them were from the New World: Oedaleonotus enigma (Scudder) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), Leptysma argentina Bruner, Dichroplus pratensis Bruner, Sinipta dalmani Stål, and Cornops … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the bi-armed chromosomes in the common eland, a significant shift in the proximal MLH1 focus position towards the distal end of the SC arm was observed compared to bovine acrocentrics. Similar repression of male meiotic recombination in the proximal regions of bi-armed chromosomes was described in other bovid species (Vozdova et al 2013) as well as in humans (Lian et al 2008) and in mice and insects with Robertsonian fusions Martí and Bidau 2001;Dumas and Britton-Davidian 2002;Colombo 2013;Capilla et al 2014). This fact, together with the overall reduction in the number of the initial DSBs, may explain the significantly lower crossover density (the number of MLH1 foci per micrometer of the SC length) in the common eland compared to cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In the case of the bi-armed chromosomes in the common eland, a significant shift in the proximal MLH1 focus position towards the distal end of the SC arm was observed compared to bovine acrocentrics. Similar repression of male meiotic recombination in the proximal regions of bi-armed chromosomes was described in other bovid species (Vozdova et al 2013) as well as in humans (Lian et al 2008) and in mice and insects with Robertsonian fusions Martí and Bidau 2001;Dumas and Britton-Davidian 2002;Colombo 2013;Capilla et al 2014). This fact, together with the overall reduction in the number of the initial DSBs, may explain the significantly lower crossover density (the number of MLH1 foci per micrometer of the SC length) in the common eland compared to cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although mean values varied between analyses, F1 hybrids/trivalents always exhibited the same distribution pattern: a pronounced decrease in recombination in the proximal regions of the chromosomes compared with St mice/St bivalents. Such modifications in the recombination landscape owing to Rb fusions appear to be a general feature of this type of rearrangement as they have also been observed in a diversity of organisms, that is, shrews, grasshoppers and fish (Borodin et al, 2008;Colombo, 2013;Ostberg et al, 2013). Thus, a growing number of studies demonstrate that heterozygosity for Rb rearrangements is associated with reduced recombination in the proximal regions of chromosomes.…”
Section: Effect Of Rb Heterozygosity On Recombination Patternsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As the reduction in Rb heterozygotes is related to meiotic pairing defects in the centromeric region of trivalents (Davisson and Akeson, 1993), the same mechanism cannot apply to Rb bivalents that show conventional pairing patterns (Manterola et al, 2009). Such discrepancies require further assessment to determine the nature of the mechanisms involved in the modifications of recombination patterns (Dumas and Britton-Davidian, 2002;Colombo, 2013;Capilla et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Rb Heterozygosity On Recombination Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the model of this kind of variation, populations in the center of a species geographic distribution have a higher genetic diversity than those at the margins [31, 32]. This model was observed in the chromosome inversions patterns of Drosophila willistoni , [33], Trimerotropis pallidipennis [34], and Chironomus plumosus [35], and in fusions of Dichroplus pratensis [36]. In the present work, the Santarém population would be central, while the others (Afuá, Rurópolis, Belém, Moju, Acará, Bragança, Santa Bárbara and Benevides) would be marginal.
Fig.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%