Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro‐Doppler‐based in‐home aided and unaided walking recognition with multiple radar and sonar systems

Abstract: The potential for using micro-Doppler signatures as a basis for distinguishing between aided and unaided gaits is considered in this paper for the purpose of characterizing normal elderly gait and assessment of patient recovery. In particular, five different classes of mobility are considered: normal unaided walking, walking with a limp, walking using a cane or tripod, walking with a walker, and using a wheelchair. This presents a challenging classification problem as the differences in micro-Doppler for these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Distinguishing among the different motions is viewed as an inter-class classification [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], whereas the intra-class classification amounts to identifying the different members of the same class, e.g., classifying normal and abnormal gaits [13][14][15][16][17][18]. There are two main approaches of human motion classifications, namely those relying on handcrafted features that relate to human motion kinematics [7,8,[13][14][15], and others which are data driven and include low-dimension representations [6,16], frequency-warped cepstral analysis [12], and neural networks [9-11, 17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Distinguishing among the different motions is viewed as an inter-class classification [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], whereas the intra-class classification amounts to identifying the different members of the same class, e.g., classifying normal and abnormal gaits [13][14][15][16][17][18]. There are two main approaches of human motion classifications, namely those relying on handcrafted features that relate to human motion kinematics [7,8,[13][14][15], and others which are data driven and include low-dimension representations [6,16], frequency-warped cepstral analysis [12], and neural networks [9-11, 17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyze two types of limping gait, where one or both legs are not swinging normally. Further, we consider two different synchronization styles between the cane and the legs and their effects on the detection of walking aids; a subject that has gained increased interest in the latest past [25], [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same can be said for the forearm. This is different from hand motions which involve different and flexible motions of the palm and the fingers, and it is certainly distinct from body motions which yield intricate micro-Doppler (MD) signatures [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%