2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of 2 Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Shaping Root Canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
49
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though all the systems tested in the present study produced some degree of apical transportation, no significant differences were observed across the instruments, which is in line with other studies [9, 17, 22, 26, 40]. Mtwo files are fabricated from conventional NiTi alloy, constant tapered, and usually associated with good maintenance of the original canal curvature [12, 13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though all the systems tested in the present study produced some degree of apical transportation, no significant differences were observed across the instruments, which is in line with other studies [9, 17, 22, 26, 40]. Mtwo files are fabricated from conventional NiTi alloy, constant tapered, and usually associated with good maintenance of the original canal curvature [12, 13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, Mtwo instruments have an S-shaped, cross-sectional design and a positive rake angle with 2 cutting edges and low radial contact to increase their flexibility and improve performance inside the root canal [12, 13]. RaCe instruments have a triangular cross-sectional design with sharp, alternating cutting edges that enhance cutting efficiency while producing a more centered canal shape [14-17]. The ProTaper family of instruments comprises NiTi files with a progressively tapered design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matched images of the surface areas of the root canals before and after preparation were examined to evaluate the percentage of uninstrumented canal wall surface (number of static voxel surface) (da Silva Limoeiro et al . ). All values were calculated by subtracting the scores for the treated canals from those recorded for their untreated counterparts and then converted into percentages (Amoroso‐Silva et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these instruments on different parameters of root canal treatment (shaping ability, microbial reduction, endotoxin reduction, post-operative pain); however, the exact role of the type of instrument on clinical outcomes remains unclear (9,(23)(24)(25). The search yielded a large number of studies evaluating the effect of root canal treatment procedures (instrumentation, irrigation and intracranial medication) on endotoxin reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%