“…It has previously been concluded [8,19] on the basis of a simple calculus that if an acceptable experimental error in the measurement of the eluting zone broadness lies within 1 to 2%, r ex can be as high as 14 to 20% of r c . The experimental evaluation of the contribution of r ex to r T can be carried out by the measurement of the eluting zone broadness of a non-retained low molar mass marker on the whole separation system and then on the system without the separation channel.…”
Section: Miniaturization and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,16,17,22,25,27,28] Polymer latex particles were successfully separated in the nanometer size range up to several micrometers, as well as biological cells. [8,16,17,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] In …”
Section: Miniaturization Of Thermal Fffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, under extreme experimental conditions it should be approximately 14 kW (!). This substantial drawback is fully eliminated in microthermal FFF, [8,16,17] (see Figure 1) for which maximum heating power is less than 100 W, and, consequently, a circulating cooling thermostat with the cooling power of 300 W can comfortably be used to cool the cold wall. Such an experimental setup thus allows perfect control of the temperatures of the hot and cold walls.…”
Section: Technical Advantages Of Miniaturizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details concerning the retention and efficiency in FFF can be found in several sources. [2,[15][16][17] Equation (1) was modified [8] to obtain:…”
Section: Miniaturization and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting microfluidic systems have been intensively developed and progressively applied for the fractionation and characterization of polymers, nanoparticles, and micrometer-sized particles. Microfluidic FFF devices devoted to the separation of polymers and particles were originally proposed and described for microthermal FFF, [8] asymmetrical flow FFF, [9,10] and electrical FFF. [11] Many articles on this topic have been published since 1966, most of them representing progress in FFF methodology and instrumentation.…”
More than 45 years have passed since the invention of field-flow fractionation (FFF). During this time, several methods and techniques, differing mainly by the nature of the applied field, have been proposed and experimentally implemented. However, only few of them are currently in practical laboratory use. Recent trends of miniaturization of all separation techniques have also been followed in the development of FFF apparatus. The aim of this work is to give an overview of the advances that are important in the practical use of microfluidic FFF techniques. Another aim is a critical evaluation of the crucial characteristics of the most widespread FFF techniques performed in standard-size channels.
“…It has previously been concluded [8,19] on the basis of a simple calculus that if an acceptable experimental error in the measurement of the eluting zone broadness lies within 1 to 2%, r ex can be as high as 14 to 20% of r c . The experimental evaluation of the contribution of r ex to r T can be carried out by the measurement of the eluting zone broadness of a non-retained low molar mass marker on the whole separation system and then on the system without the separation channel.…”
Section: Miniaturization and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,16,17,22,25,27,28] Polymer latex particles were successfully separated in the nanometer size range up to several micrometers, as well as biological cells. [8,16,17,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] In …”
Section: Miniaturization Of Thermal Fffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, under extreme experimental conditions it should be approximately 14 kW (!). This substantial drawback is fully eliminated in microthermal FFF, [8,16,17] (see Figure 1) for which maximum heating power is less than 100 W, and, consequently, a circulating cooling thermostat with the cooling power of 300 W can comfortably be used to cool the cold wall. Such an experimental setup thus allows perfect control of the temperatures of the hot and cold walls.…”
Section: Technical Advantages Of Miniaturizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details concerning the retention and efficiency in FFF can be found in several sources. [2,[15][16][17] Equation (1) was modified [8] to obtain:…”
Section: Miniaturization and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting microfluidic systems have been intensively developed and progressively applied for the fractionation and characterization of polymers, nanoparticles, and micrometer-sized particles. Microfluidic FFF devices devoted to the separation of polymers and particles were originally proposed and described for microthermal FFF, [8] asymmetrical flow FFF, [9,10] and electrical FFF. [11] Many articles on this topic have been published since 1966, most of them representing progress in FFF methodology and instrumentation.…”
More than 45 years have passed since the invention of field-flow fractionation (FFF). During this time, several methods and techniques, differing mainly by the nature of the applied field, have been proposed and experimentally implemented. However, only few of them are currently in practical laboratory use. Recent trends of miniaturization of all separation techniques have also been followed in the development of FFF apparatus. The aim of this work is to give an overview of the advances that are important in the practical use of microfluidic FFF techniques. Another aim is a critical evaluation of the crucial characteristics of the most widespread FFF techniques performed in standard-size channels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.