2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro- and nanostructures reflect the degree of diagenetic alteration in modern and fossil brachiopod shell calcite: A multi-analytical screening approach (CL, FE-SEM, AFM, EBSD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TEM analysis of shell RCK16 ( G. okensis ) (Figs 5–6) shows that the columnar layer is formed by nanoscopic, biocomposite mesocrystal calcite ( sensu Casella et al . ) that is built up by grains approximately co‐oriented and with the c‐axis lying on the plane of observation (the longitudinal section of the brachiopod shell; Fig. A), as observed in Recent taxa (Ye et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…TEM analysis of shell RCK16 ( G. okensis ) (Figs 5–6) shows that the columnar layer is formed by nanoscopic, biocomposite mesocrystal calcite ( sensu Casella et al . ) that is built up by grains approximately co‐oriented and with the c‐axis lying on the plane of observation (the longitudinal section of the brachiopod shell; Fig. A), as observed in Recent taxa (Ye et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There is no sign of calcite crystals with a rhombohedral morphology in the columnar layer, which argues against alteration (Casella et al . ). The columnar microstructure (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations