2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro- and nano-scale phenomena effect on bubble size in mechanical flotation cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the well-known Young’s equation, a reduced surface tension at the water–air interface in the presence of frothers leads to the weakening of hydrophobic interactions between an air bubble and a solid particle . From this fundamental principle, a reduction of the recovery of quartz with increasing frother concentration would be expected but is certainly not observed even when the critical coalescence concentration­(CCC) , of DF250 (7.2 ppm) is surpassed, i.e., when the Sauter diameter of the bubbles does not decrease with further addition of the frother. Indeed, the contrary is shown in Figure , where the well-documented positive effects on the use of frothers are corroborated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the well-known Young’s equation, a reduced surface tension at the water–air interface in the presence of frothers leads to the weakening of hydrophobic interactions between an air bubble and a solid particle . From this fundamental principle, a reduction of the recovery of quartz with increasing frother concentration would be expected but is certainly not observed even when the critical coalescence concentration­(CCC) , of DF250 (7.2 ppm) is surpassed, i.e., when the Sauter diameter of the bubbles does not decrease with further addition of the frother. Indeed, the contrary is shown in Figure , where the well-documented positive effects on the use of frothers are corroborated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations by Javor et al, (2015) also conclude that highly surface-active agents decrease bubble size at its lower concentration than the weak agents because in the presence of weakly surfaceactive reagents, the molecule exchange occurs rapidly at the air/liquid interface due to the quick diffusion controlled adsorption/desorption. However, the adsorption/desorption of highly surfaceactive molecules occurs with a long characteristic time caused by the molecule reorientation which sharply diminishes the bubble size.…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoscale Bubble and Particle On Bubble Size Distrmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The routine consists on finding an adaptive threshold level, defining the edges of the bubbles and fitting to an ellipse on these edges, finally calculating the equivalent diameter based on the maximum and minimum diameter of the ellipse using Eq. 3 (Jávor et al, 2015):…”
Section: Bubble Size Foam Depth and Foam Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the minimum bubble diameter detected with this method was of 0.02 mm. The Sauter mean diameter (D32) of each measured concentration was calculated based on the diameter results received from the MATLAB® routine (Jávor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Bubble Size Foam Depth and Foam Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%