2020
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00606-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MICOM: Metagenome-Scale Modeling To Infer Metabolic Interactions in the Gut Microbiota

Abstract: Compositional changes in the gut microbiota have been associated with a variety of medical conditions such as obesity, Crohn’s disease, and diabetes. However, connecting microbial community composition to ecosystem function remains a challenge. Here, we introduce MICOM, a customizable metabolic model of the human gut microbiome. By using a heuristic optimization approach based on L2 regularization, we were able to obtain a unique set of realistic growth rates that corresponded well with observed replication ra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
199
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(66 reference statements)
5
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ongoing research is working on identifying and annotating novel human microbiome species which is needed as a basis for metabolic modeling. Furthermore, once models are generated, details on material (protein, metabolite) exchange and appropriate community objective functions need to be considered [6,21,36]. Advances in this manner will aid in understanding the integrated function of the microbiome (interactions and temporal dynamics) to give a better perspective of the functional microbiome [26,28,35].…”
Section: Perspectives and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ongoing research is working on identifying and annotating novel human microbiome species which is needed as a basis for metabolic modeling. Furthermore, once models are generated, details on material (protein, metabolite) exchange and appropriate community objective functions need to be considered [6,21,36]. Advances in this manner will aid in understanding the integrated function of the microbiome (interactions and temporal dynamics) to give a better perspective of the functional microbiome [26,28,35].…”
Section: Perspectives and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease, diet, geography, lifestyle and even occupation are responsible for giving a unique gut microbiome for every individual as these factors hugely alter the microbiome [48,60,66]. These alterations happening in this large-scale system can be explored only by investigating the metabolic interactions among the microbes, microbe and diet/host and for that, community-based genome scale metabolic modeling may help once annotated species are identified [27,36]. Furthermore, the gut microbiome is involved in many biological functions like carbohydrate metabolism, colonization resistance, and ROS production during cancer [39,53,64].…”
Section: Perspectives and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, most of the studies described above are static, but allow for large and potentially complex microbial communities (hundreds or thousands of strains) [34,30,35,40]. In contrast, dynamic methods, including the MDP-biomeGEM approach described here, are only capable of modelling smaller, simpler population structures (approx.…”
Section: Comparison With Peer Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michaelis-Menten or Hill kinetics) are a particularly common choice [32,28,29]. We show that a simpler quadratic species-metabolite interaction (QSMI) model can recapitulate the growth experiment outcomes of Friedman et al [16] with a single parameterization.It is worth noting explicitly that our work does not explore the accuracy of specific modeling tools [33,34,35,36], but instead examines whether the mathematical formulation of the model could ever be used to recapitulate the biological dynamics. A positive answer means that the mathematical form of the model can potentially be useful, indicating promise for future endeavors, while a negative answer indicates that the basic formulation of the model is inappropriate for predictive models of microbial communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%