2021
DOI: 10.1177/0022242921996277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mickey D’s Has More Street Cred Than McDonald’s: Consumer Brand Nickname Use Signals Information Authenticity

Abstract: Consumers often observe how other consumers interact with brands to inform their own brand judgments. This research demonstrates that brand relationship quality-indicating cues, such as brand nicknames (e.g., Mickey D’s for McDonald’s and Wally World for Walmart), enhance perceived information authenticity in online communication. An analysis of historical Twitter data followed by six experiments (using both real and fictitious brands across different online platforms, e.g., online reviews and social media pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal rankings were established on the basis of consulting Clarivate: Journal Citation Reports; Web of Science Social Citation Index (SSCI); Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS) Academic Journal Guides 2021. The oldest article included in the study was published in 2005 in the Journal of Consumer Psychology and is a highly cited paper on the topic (Thomson et al, 2005) and the most recent article by Zhang and Patrick (2021) is published in the Journal of Marketing .…”
Section: Literature Review Methods and The Sample Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Journal rankings were established on the basis of consulting Clarivate: Journal Citation Reports; Web of Science Social Citation Index (SSCI); Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS) Academic Journal Guides 2021. The oldest article included in the study was published in 2005 in the Journal of Consumer Psychology and is a highly cited paper on the topic (Thomson et al, 2005) and the most recent article by Zhang and Patrick (2021) is published in the Journal of Marketing .…”
Section: Literature Review Methods and The Sample Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to purchase intentions include the variables ‘share of wallet’ (Hwang et al, 2019) as well as ‘willingness to pay’, cited in studies ( n = 4) (Hyun & Han, 2015; Jiménez & Voss, 2014; Li et al, 2019; Zhang & Patrick, 2021) as a dependent variable when conducting research on brand attachment. Willingness to pay is a measure of how much a consumer might be prepared to pay for goods, especially in relation to desirable brands.…”
Section: (C) Characteristics: Brand Attachment As a Mediator Antecede...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the first hypothesis and understand if a statistically significant difference in advertising effectiveness existed between the native and banner advertisements, a t -test was used to dichotomously compare the banner ads with the feed ads. Previous marketing research has used similar tests to understand the marketing impact of two conditions (Zhang and Patrick, 2021). Because banner advertisements cannot be shared or commented on, differences were compared based on their condition (feed or banner ad) and then their impact on dependent measures of impressions as well as link clicks was measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to impulsive/compulsive purchases (Lim et al 2020;Japutra et al 2018c;Ramadan et al 2021), consumers also show a willingness to pay a premium price for brands to which they have an attachment (Sreejesh et al 2016;Orth et al 2012;Thomson et al 2005). Furthermore, as a consequence of brand attachment, consumers perceive brand-related information as authentic (Zhang and Patrick 2021), spread positive word-of-mouth (Kwon and Mattila 2015;Magnoni et al 2021;VanMeter et al 2018), defend the brand from criticism (Japutra et al 2014), show resistance to negative information (Japutra et al 2018a;Lin et al 2021), forgive the brand in cases of transgression (Fedorikhin et al 2008), join the brand community (Takamatsu 2021;Hung 2014), and perform difficult behaviour (Park et al 2010). Consumers also exhibit positive attitudes towards brand logo change (Walsh et al 2019;Grobert et al 2016), new products (Aboulnasr and Tran 2020), and brand extensions (Chang et al 2020;Pourazad et al 2019).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Brand Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%