2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mice with Chronically Elevated Dopamine Exhibit Enhanced Motivation, but not Learning, for a Food Reward

Abstract: Dopamine has been critically implicated in learning and motivation, although its precise role remains to be determined. In order to investigate the involvement of dopamine in learning and motivation for a food reward, we used dopamine transporter knockdown mice (DAT KD) that have chronically elevated levels of extracellular dopamine. The present study demonstrates that chronically elevated dopamine enhances tendency to work for a food reward without apparent effects on Pavlovian and operant learning for this r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

31
163
3
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(82 reference statements)
31
163
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, it has been shown that a DA D3 agonist decreased cocaine self-administration when the workload was high but had no effect when the workload was low (i.e., similar effect to STN DBS) (36). Quite contradictory, it has also been shown that (i) an inactivation of the DA system induced the same kind of effect for food reward (i.e., decreased motivation under high workload and no effect under low workload) (37,38) and (ii) DAT knock-down mice whose characteristic is to have an increased DA transmission showed enhanced motivation for food under high workload (39). To clarify how STN DBS affects DA-related functions, STN and DA systems interactions need to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, it has been shown that a DA D3 agonist decreased cocaine self-administration when the workload was high but had no effect when the workload was low (i.e., similar effect to STN DBS) (36). Quite contradictory, it has also been shown that (i) an inactivation of the DA system induced the same kind of effect for food reward (i.e., decreased motivation under high workload and no effect under low workload) (37,38) and (ii) DAT knock-down mice whose characteristic is to have an increased DA transmission showed enhanced motivation for food under high workload (39). To clarify how STN DBS affects DA-related functions, STN and DA systems interactions need to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More fundamentally, while a number of neuroscientists have shown that the firing of dopamine neurons correlates beautifully to patterns expected from computational models of reward learning, questions have recently emerged about whether the dopamine signals are actually ever needed to cause the learning to occur (Berridge 2007;Cagniard et al 2006a;Palmiter 2007;Panksepp 2005;Redgrave and Gurney 2006). Regarding whether dopamine is needed at all to learn about rewards, several forms of reward learning have recently been shown to proceed normally in the brains of mice that completely lack dopamine signals (due to genetic manipulation that prevents dopamine synthesis by neurons), presumably both phasic and tonic signals (Hnasko et al 2005;Robinson et al 2005).…”
Section: Dopamine-beyond Learning Too?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding whether dopamine is needed at all to learn about rewards, several forms of reward learning have recently been shown to proceed normally in the brains of mice that completely lack dopamine signals (due to genetic manipulation that prevents dopamine synthesis by neurons), presumably both phasic and tonic signals (Hnasko et al 2005;Robinson et al 2005). Conversely, elevation of dopamine neurotransmission by a different genetic manipulation may fail to cause or alter teaching signals needed for new reward learning (Cagniard et al 2006a;Cagniard et al 2006b;Niv et al 2007;Tindell et al 2005;Yin et al 2006). Such observations raise room to doubts whether correlations between dopamine signals and learning necessarily imply that the dopamine has a strong causal role in learning.…”
Section: Dopamine-beyond Learning Too?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via the use of c-Fos immunoreactivity, a marker of neuronal activation (Morgan & Curran, 1991;Sheng & Greenberg, 1990), the activity of five brain regions was simultaneously quantified; these were pre-and infralimbic mPFC, NAcc core and shell, and dorsal striatum. Further, it is worth noting that increased levels of ΔFosB, the protein product of another member of the fos family of genes, in the NAcc is associated with increased food motivation (Olausson et al, 2006;Cagniard et al, 2006).By generating neuroanatomical maps of c-Fos immunoreactivity, we were able to discern a fluid and co-varied pattern of activation across the component structures of the mesocorticolimbic DA system that changed as a function of both consumption and the animal's motivational state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%