2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mice heterozygous for the Cdh23/Ahl1 mutation show age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the auditory thresholds at specific frequencies of sound, audiograms were obtained by recording amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR). The AMFR is an electrophysiological response that is more sensitive and frequency-specific than the ABR, and is not reliant on any subjective evaluation [ 51 , 52 ]. The recorded audiograms revealed no differences between genotypes ( Fig 4B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To examine the auditory thresholds at specific frequencies of sound, audiograms were obtained by recording amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR). The AMFR is an electrophysiological response that is more sensitive and frequency-specific than the ABR, and is not reliant on any subjective evaluation [ 51 , 52 ]. The recorded audiograms revealed no differences between genotypes ( Fig 4B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same open field speaker arrangement and electrode placement were used as described above. The general amplitude-modulated frequency response principle is described in [ 50 , 51 ] and performed herein as described in [ 52 ]. In brief, the detection is based on the magnitude squared coherence (MSC) algorithm calculated with modulation sounds and the recorded responses of the electrical potential produced by the brain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBA/CaJ mice are homozygous for the wild-type Cdh23 gene and maintain normal hearing through their lifespan. A single copy of the wild type Cdh23 allele is sufficient for normal auditory processing until at least one year of age (Frisina et al, 2011;Burghard et al, 2019;Lyngholm and Sakata, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also show that the B6.cdh23 +/mice have comparable high-frequency SC response to the CBA/CaJ mice, but only partially restored topographic maps. Others have also shown that the C57BL/6 mice heterozygous for the Cdh23/Ahl1 mutation show age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing (Burghard et al, 2019). Furthermore, since both F1(CBA/CaJ x C57BL/6) and B6.cdh23 +/are heterozygous for the Cdh23 mutation, we speculate that the reason for the absence of a complete restoration might be that C57BL/6 mice harbor other mutations outside of Cdh23 that affect high-frequency hearing, as has been reviewed (Bowl & Dawson, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that this rescues the age-related hearing deficit of C57BL/6 mice (Firisnia et al 2001, (Lyngholm & Sakata, 2019), demonstrating that it is recessive alleles carried by the C57BL/6 mice that lead to deafness. The auditory deficits of C57BL/6 mice can also at least be partially restored by changing the C57BL/6 mutant Cdh23 allele with the wildtype allele using CRISPR (Mianné et al, 2016), although one report suggested that hearing is only partially restored in this mouse line (Burghard et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%