2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MICAN : a protein structure alignment algorithm that can handle Multiple-chains, Inverse alignments, C α only models, Alternative alignments, and Non-sequential alignments

Abstract: BackgroundProtein pairs that have the same secondary structure packing arrangement but have different topologies have attracted much attention in terms of both evolution and physical chemistry of protein structures. Further investigation of such protein relationships would give us a hint as to how proteins can change their fold in the course of evolution, as well as a insight into physico-chemical properties of secondary structure packing. For this purpose, highly accurate sequence order independent structure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D protein structure alignment is a complex and time-consuming process due to complexity of 3D protein structures, huge search space, and computational complexity of algorithms used to complete the process. In the last decades, various scientists and research centers have designed and developed a variety of methods for aligning 3D protein structures, finding similarities between proteins, or classifying protein structures into groups, including VAST [9,20], DALI [11], LOCK2 [38], FATCAT [47], CE [40], FAST [49], MultiProt [39], MotifMiner [4], MICAN [26], APGM [14], DEDAL [5], CASSERT [29,33], and others. These methods rely on various representative features of 3D protein structures.…”
Section: Methods For Protein Structure Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D protein structure alignment is a complex and time-consuming process due to complexity of 3D protein structures, huge search space, and computational complexity of algorithms used to complete the process. In the last decades, various scientists and research centers have designed and developed a variety of methods for aligning 3D protein structures, finding similarities between proteins, or classifying protein structures into groups, including VAST [9,20], DALI [11], LOCK2 [38], FATCAT [47], CE [40], FAST [49], MultiProt [39], MotifMiner [4], MICAN [26], APGM [14], DEDAL [5], CASSERT [29,33], and others. These methods rely on various representative features of 3D protein structures.…”
Section: Methods For Protein Structure Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each pair with the same Superfamily/Family, identity of their binding sites was evaluated. The 3D structures of each pair were superimposed on the basis of their secondary structure elements, by using MICAN . When the minimum interatomic distance between the ligands is shorter than or equal to 5 Å, this pair is classified as a pair with ligands in the same binding sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) function split and solve(globalGraph) (2) INPUT: globalGraph, an alignment graph between atoms from two proteins (3) OUTPUT: globalRes, a list of the longest distinct alignments found in the graph (4) (5) ResultList globalRes = empty result list() (6) Graph[] subGraphs = split(globalGraph) (7) sort(subgraphs) (8) For each subGraph in subGraphs (9) SeedList best seeds = empty list() (10) SeedList seeds = enumerate seeds(subGraph) (11) For each seed in seeds (12) VertexSet current res = extend and filter(subGraph, seed) (13) best seeds.insert if better(seed) (14) End For (15) For each seed in best seeds (16) VertexSet current res = extend and filter(globalGraph, seed) (17) globalRes.insert if better(current res) (18) End For (19) End For…”
Section: Graph Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other nonsequential structure alignment methods have been recently proposed (excellent review on this topic can be found in the very recent reference [16]). None of them is close to the approach proposed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%