2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MICA sounding rocket observations of conductivity‐gradient‐generated auroral ionospheric responses: Small‐scale structure with large‐scale drivers

Abstract: A detailed, in situ study of field-aligned current (FAC) structure in a transient, substorm expansion phase auroral arc is conducted using electric field, magnetometer, and electron density measurements from the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling in the Alfvén Resonator (MICA) sounding rocket, launched from Poker Flat, AK. These data are supplemented with larger-scale, contextual measurements from a heterogeneous collection of ground-based instruments including the Poker Flat incoherent scatter radar and nearby… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use these measurements to estimate the Alfvén velocity v A = δ E / δ B ≈ 200 km s −1 . This corresponds to an Alfvén conductance Σ A = 0.25 S which is much smaller than the Pedersen conductance Σ P = 20 S (calculated for the MICA case study by Lynch et al []), as is typical for Alfvén waves [ Paschmann et al , ]. These evidences of Alfvénic activity (an indirect source for ELF WPI) from a variety of ground‐based and in situ observations lead us to consider heating of the bulk thermal ion population by wave‐particle interactions.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison To Previous Observationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use these measurements to estimate the Alfvén velocity v A = δ E / δ B ≈ 200 km s −1 . This corresponds to an Alfvén conductance Σ A = 0.25 S which is much smaller than the Pedersen conductance Σ P = 20 S (calculated for the MICA case study by Lynch et al []), as is typical for Alfvén waves [ Paschmann et al , ]. These evidences of Alfvénic activity (an indirect source for ELF WPI) from a variety of ground‐based and in situ observations lead us to consider heating of the bulk thermal ion population by wave‐particle interactions.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison To Previous Observationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The first is a fine‐scale, high‐resolution simulation that uses Venetie medium‐field imager data to specify electron precipitation (0.5 s cadence) and MICA DC electric fields as measured by the COWBOY instrument [ Lynch et al , ]. This simulation encapsulates the apogee portion of the MICA flight.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison To Previous Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant driver of broadband precipitation is the convergence of Alfvénic Poynting flux (S ⟂ ) in the auroral acceleration region (AAR, located at altitudes between ∼0.2 and 2 Earth radii [Forsyth et al, 2012]) causing a divergence of particle kinetic energy flux (KE || ) over a broad range of energies into the ionosphere [Lotko, 1986;Thayer and Semeter, 2004;Newell et al, 2009]. The predominant driver of broadband precipitation is the convergence of Alfvénic Poynting flux (S ⟂ ) in the auroral acceleration region (AAR, located at altitudes between ∼0.2 and 2 Earth radii [Forsyth et al, 2012]) causing a divergence of particle kinetic energy flux (KE || ) over a broad range of energies into the ionosphere [Lotko, 1986;Thayer and Semeter, 2004;Newell et al, 2009].…”
Section: Relationship Between Eof3 and Alfvén Poynting Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(top) In situ electric fields in geomagnetic coordinates in blue and green (adapted from Lynch et al []). Black corresponds to the perpendicular component of the electric field from the simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overview of the MICA flight (adapted from Lynch et al []). (first panel) Electric field, (second panel) magnetic field, (third panel) the Poynting flux calculated from E and B fields (positive is downward), (fourth panel) the optical intensity measured by the medium‐field camera, and (fifth panel) the plasma density measured by the mNLP probe.…”
Section: Mica Datamentioning
confidence: 99%