2015
DOI: 10.7309/jmtm.4.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“mHealth is an Innovative Approach to Address Health Literacy and Improve Patient-Physician Communication – An HIV Testing Exemplar”

Abstract: Low health literacy is a barrier for many patients in the U.S. Patients with low health literacy have poor communication with their physicians, and thus face worse health outcomes. Several government agencies have highlighted strategies for improving and overcoming low health literacy. Mobile phone technology could be leveraged to implement these strategies to improve communication between patients and their physicians. Text messaging, in particular, is a simple and interactive platform that may be ideal for p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, mHealth could be an innovative strategy to meeting HIV prevention needs in China, such as increasing HIV testing rates and disseminating HIV prevention and treatment interventions to high-risk populations such as MSM [ 17 19 ]. mHealth strategies - including text messaging or SMS [ 20 , 21 ], software applications such as Facebook [ 22 , 23 ], and multiple media interventions [ 24 ] - have been demonstrated as feasible for reaching community samples of MSM. However, to maximize uptake and scalability of mHealth strategies, interventions must engage the prospective end-users in order to consider the trends, patterns, and normative preferences of technology use in specific geographic settings [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, mHealth could be an innovative strategy to meeting HIV prevention needs in China, such as increasing HIV testing rates and disseminating HIV prevention and treatment interventions to high-risk populations such as MSM [ 17 19 ]. mHealth strategies - including text messaging or SMS [ 20 , 21 ], software applications such as Facebook [ 22 , 23 ], and multiple media interventions [ 24 ] - have been demonstrated as feasible for reaching community samples of MSM. However, to maximize uptake and scalability of mHealth strategies, interventions must engage the prospective end-users in order to consider the trends, patterns, and normative preferences of technology use in specific geographic settings [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Mobile health (mHealth) strategies representing the use of mobile technologies, such as mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and other wireless devices to support medical and public health practice, can be an innovative approach to increase HIV testing rates. [23][24][25] There are approximately 5 billion mobile phone subscriptions in the world. 26 Because such a large number of individuals use mobile phones, mHealth behavioural interventions have been implemented and evaluated in low-and middle-income countries to improve HIV care outcomes relating to antiretroviral initiation and adherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As mobile phone text messaging has been shown to promote patient-physician communication, text messages providing information on HIV testing may encourage high-risk individuals to seek community or clinic-based HTS. 23,25,31 Mobile phone text messaging may also be an effective tool to improve HIV testing selfefficacy given that information can be personalized and interactive. 23 Previous reviews [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] have examined the use of mobile phone technologies in HIV prevention and treatment, but have not specifically examined the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on the uptake of HIV testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research evaluating message content that addresses additional barriers to testing may yield more pronounced effects. 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%