2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MHD-kinetic hybrid code based on structure-preserving finite elements with particles-in-cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the spatial discretization, we adopt a finite‐volume/finite‐difference scheme on staggered grids that can be considered as an extention of the previous work 39 to an implicit treatment of the magnetic forces, but it can be regarded also as a first finite‐difference actuation of the theory of finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) in the discretization of the MHD equations 52,53 . In this work the choice of staggered grids is motivated mainly by two argument: the preservation of the divergence‐free condition of the magnetic field, or the velocity field in the incompressible limit; the preservation of the duality relation between the discrete differential operators.…”
Section: Semi‐implicit Discretization On Staggered Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the spatial discretization, we adopt a finite‐volume/finite‐difference scheme on staggered grids that can be considered as an extention of the previous work 39 to an implicit treatment of the magnetic forces, but it can be regarded also as a first finite‐difference actuation of the theory of finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) in the discretization of the MHD equations 52,53 . In this work the choice of staggered grids is motivated mainly by two argument: the preservation of the divergence‐free condition of the magnetic field, or the velocity field in the incompressible limit; the preservation of the duality relation between the discrete differential operators.…”
Section: Semi‐implicit Discretization On Staggered Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the spatial discretization, we adopt a finite-volume/finite-difference scheme on staggered grids that can be considered as an extention of the previous work 39 to an implicit treatment of the magnetic forces, but it can be regarded also as a first finite-difference actuation of the theory of finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) in the discretization of the MHD equations. 52,53 In this work the choice of staggered grids is motivated mainly by two argument: the preservation of the divergence-free condition of the magnetic field, or the velocity field in the incompressible limit; the preservation of the duality relation between the discrete differential operators. Dating back to Yee, 54 the use of staggered grids is known to be particularly indicated for the electric and magnetic fields, and then also for the MHD equations, Indeed, it has been shown that an electric field E defined on a mesh that is dual with respect to the mesh of the magnetic field B is the natural way of preserving the divergence-free condition up to machine error.…”
Section: Semi-implicit Discretization On Staggered Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure-preserving particle-in-cell (PIC) algorithms preserve many of the geometric and topological mathematical structures of a point-particle kinetic plasma model, including its symplectic structure, symmetries, conservation laws, and cohomology (Villasenor & Buneman 1992;Esirkepov 2001;Squire et al 2012;Evstatiev & Shadwick 2013;Xiao et al 2013;Moon et al 2015;Qin et al 2015;Xiao et al 2015;He et al 2015;Crouseilles et al 2015;Qin et al 2016;He et al 2016;Burby 2017;Morrison 2017;Kraus & Hirvijoki 2017;Xiao et al 2018;Xiao & Qin 2019;Glasser & Qin 2020;Hirvijoki et al 2020;Wang et al 2021-07;Xiao & Qin 2021;Holderied et al 2021;Perse et al 2021;O'Connor et al 2021;Pinto et al 2021). One such structure, gauge symmetry, was first preserved in a PIC code in the Lagrangian formalism via a variational method (Squire et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature's recent structure-preserving Hamiltonian PIC methods employ a non-canonical Poisson structure to describe particle degrees of freedom (X, V) and discrete electromagnetic fields (E, B) (Qin et al 2015;Xiao et al 2015;He et al 2015;Crouseilles et al 2015;He et al 2016;Burby 2017;Morrison 2017;Kraus & Hirvijoki 2017;Xiao et al 2018;Xiao & Qin 2019Holderied et al 2021;Perse et al 2021;Pinto et al 2021). This approach hides from view the gauge symmetry of the Vlasov-Maxwell system and the simplicity of its canonical Poisson structure, which is characterized by the electromagnetic potential A and its conjugate momentum Y ∼ dA/dt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of this structure might be important for the construction of structure preserving Hamiltonian algorithms that improve the stability and the fidelity of plasma simulations (Kraus et al 2017;Morrison 2017). Such a structure-preserving code has been recently developed for the simulation of MHD waves that interact with energetic particles in the framework of hybrid kinetic-MHD (Holderied, Possanner & Wang 2021). Moreover, we obtain a second model upon considering the method of Hamiltonian construction of Tronci (2010) for the PCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%