2013
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.62.1461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MgO overlayer thickness dependence of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process induces atomic intermixing phenomenon at interfaces, allowing for a larger MDL with increasing annealing temperatures. However, simultaneously, the B out-diffusion from the CoFeB also led to the enhancement of CoFeB crystallization, corresponding to the increased M S [21]. As previously mentioned, a relatively thin CoFeB layer experienced the PMA degradation at 450°C, while a relatively thick CoFeB maintained the dominant PMA features at the same annealing temperature (shown in Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process induces atomic intermixing phenomenon at interfaces, allowing for a larger MDL with increasing annealing temperatures. However, simultaneously, the B out-diffusion from the CoFeB also led to the enhancement of CoFeB crystallization, corresponding to the increased M S [21]. As previously mentioned, a relatively thin CoFeB layer experienced the PMA degradation at 450°C, while a relatively thick CoFeB maintained the dominant PMA features at the same annealing temperature (shown in Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Clear PMA behaviors were observed for the samples with CoFeB thickness up to 1.7 nm and the transition behavior to in-plane magnetic anisotropy (IMA) appeared when the t CFB was thicker than 1.8 nm. As previously reported, [18,20,21] the maximum CoFeB thickness ensuring the PMA features in a typical Ta/CoFeB/MgO frame was approximately 1.3 nm without an inter-layer exchange coupling. Therefore, a noticeable PMA observation at a 1.7 nm thick CoFeB layer would enable a flexible production margin in practical industrial applications when a thick CoFeB is available in the fabrication process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although 3 nm MgO is too thick for practical use in MTJs, it was chosen to ensure continuity of the MgO layers and lessen the influence of the layers beyond it. [10,14,15] (Measurements of similar samples with 1 nm of MgO on both sides of the magnetic layer yielded the same trends. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…With very thin MgO (less than 1 nm), we believe that some Ta diffuses from the capping layer through MgO and reduces K I [8]. Indeed, 1 nm thick MgO is expected to be amorphous, which possibly favour the Ta diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies tried to optimize the PMA and to clarify its origin by studying its dependence on the thickness of the magnetic layer [2][3][4], on the buffer layer [4], the oxidation condition at the interface [5][6][7] and the annealing temperature. We have also reported the MgO overlayer thickness dependence of the PMA, and found that the PMA strongly depends on the MgO overlayer thickness [8]. However, the variation of the PMA with the composition of CoFeB alloys [9] has not been fully investigated experimentally, and such a study may help us to understand the mechanism of PMA in CoFeB thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%