2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MgB2 powders and bioevaluation of their interaction with planktonic microbes, biofilms, and tumor cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that, from a general point of view, in the range of concentrations we tested (i.e., from 0.5 to 0.0009 mg/mL), the highest antimicrobial activity is recorded against S. aureus, followed in order by P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans. Moreover, with the partial exception of C. albicans only, it can be highlighted that all of the MIC values obtained for the present samples produced via the RLI method are lower than the ones recently reported in an analogous experiment performed using commercially available MgB2 powders [37]. In the specific case of P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), the RLI sample with the best antimicrobial activity shows an MIC value of 0.062 mg/mL that is 5 times lower than the corresponding best value (0.31 mg/mL) obtained for commercial powders.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It can be observed that, from a general point of view, in the range of concentrations we tested (i.e., from 0.5 to 0.0009 mg/mL), the highest antimicrobial activity is recorded against S. aureus, followed in order by P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans. Moreover, with the partial exception of C. albicans only, it can be highlighted that all of the MIC values obtained for the present samples produced via the RLI method are lower than the ones recently reported in an analogous experiment performed using commercially available MgB2 powders [37]. In the specific case of P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), the RLI sample with the best antimicrobial activity shows an MIC value of 0.062 mg/mL that is 5 times lower than the corresponding best value (0.31 mg/mL) obtained for commercial powders.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The data concerning the remaining samples and strains are plotted in Figure 7. These data show that the MBIC values are exactly the same as the MIC ones for S. aureus and C. albicans, confirming the good activity of MgB2 against both kinds of bacterial growth [37]. Additionally, the MBIC and MIC values of P. aeruginosa are practically identical, with a small increase in MBIC for samples MBNB04 and MNB05 only (see Figure7a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations