2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8398(01)00034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mg/Ca ratios in stressed foraminifera, Amphistegina gibbosa, from the Florida Keys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coral Mg/Ca ratios (mmol/mol) reported range from 3.896 to 5.138 (mean 4.628) for coral in Sanya Bay [23] and from 3.18 to 4.61 (mean 3.83) in the Caribbean Sea [24] . Meanwhile, the Mg/Ca ratios (mmol/mol) reported by Toler et al [25] show the higher values of 20-40 (mean 30) in gibbosa specimens (foraminiferal) and 100-150 (mean 120) in high Mg-calcite of A. angulatus (foraminferal), which is compared with the result for using seawater as a parent solution in this study. Lea et al [22] indicate temperature is primary control on foraminifara shell Mg/Ca and seawater pH is secondary influences on shell Mg/Ca and shell Mg/Ca decreases by 6% per 0.1 pH unit increase for seawater pH varying from 7.6 to 8.5, which is inconsistent with the observation in this study that Mg/Ca ratios in SCCP increase with the increase of pH values.…”
Section: Magnesium Concentration Of Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coral Mg/Ca ratios (mmol/mol) reported range from 3.896 to 5.138 (mean 4.628) for coral in Sanya Bay [23] and from 3.18 to 4.61 (mean 3.83) in the Caribbean Sea [24] . Meanwhile, the Mg/Ca ratios (mmol/mol) reported by Toler et al [25] show the higher values of 20-40 (mean 30) in gibbosa specimens (foraminiferal) and 100-150 (mean 120) in high Mg-calcite of A. angulatus (foraminferal), which is compared with the result for using seawater as a parent solution in this study. Lea et al [22] indicate temperature is primary control on foraminifara shell Mg/Ca and seawater pH is secondary influences on shell Mg/Ca and shell Mg/Ca decreases by 6% per 0.1 pH unit increase for seawater pH varying from 7.6 to 8.5, which is inconsistent with the observation in this study that Mg/Ca ratios in SCCP increase with the increase of pH values.…”
Section: Magnesium Concentration Of Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (supporting
confidence: 69%
“…A local high pH value (>9) of system solution enough to form Mg(OH) 2 should present when the drop of NaOH solution was added, but this status is infrequent, but is not absolutely impossible, for the calcification of biological carbonates. Scoffin [32] , as cited by Toler et al [25] , reported that high-magnesium calcite can contain more than 5% MgCO 3 , which implies that MgCO 3 may precipitate with CaCO 3 . In this study, the XRD of MgCO 3 in XRD curve of SCCP is not detected when comparing Figs.…”
Section: Magnesium Concentration Of Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10c). Since Mg/Ca molar ratio of benthic foraminifera is normally assumed to be between 0.0005 and 0.01 mol mol −1 (Lea, 1999;Toler et al, 2001;Toyofuku and Kitazato, 2005), we propose that conditions of environmental stress may influence the amount of Mg incorporated during the foraminifera's growth. Our results are in agreement with the experimental investigation on Mg intrashell reactions of Bentov and Erez (2005) and which are attributed to a kinetic mechanism played by the carbonate ions in the calcite growth by Lopez et al (2009).…”
Section: Environmental Conditions and Bioerosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these factors play a role in its reactivity (Stumm, 1992). Toler et al (2001) advanced the possibility that an increase in Mg/Ca ratio promotes tests damage. Therefore, differences in magnesium content make calcite tests behave differently in systems close to saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those features are related to evolution, and also to environmental factors such as climate, salinity, vegetation, hydrochemistry and even pollution conditions (Murray, 1973;Alve & Nagy, 1986;Sen Gupta, 1999;Geslin et al, 2000;Toler et al, 2001;Debeney et al, 2002;Le Cadre et al, 2003). Among these, the geochemical parameters of the carbonate equilibrium solution are of major significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%