2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2022.3182311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MFNet: Multi-Feature Fusion Network for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation in Road Scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its speed is much higher, reaching 131 FPS, a significant advantage compared to the 16.6 FPS of HyperSeg-L. Regarding segmentation speed, the FPS of the algorithm in this paper is lower than DFANet B, 43 GAS, 44 MFNet, 46 and PP-LiteSeg-T. 42 Nevertheless, the mIoU values of this paper's algorithm are 19.9%, 6.4%, 7.7%, and 4.2% higher than these algorithms, respectively, indicating that this algorithm maintains a good balance between accuracy and real-time performance while possessing a certain advantage in terms of accuracy. To visually depict the analysis results, this paper presents a scatter plot of the accuracy-speed comparison of these algorithms on the Camvid test set in Fig.…”
Section: Camvidmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, its speed is much higher, reaching 131 FPS, a significant advantage compared to the 16.6 FPS of HyperSeg-L. Regarding segmentation speed, the FPS of the algorithm in this paper is lower than DFANet B, 43 GAS, 44 MFNet, 46 and PP-LiteSeg-T. 42 Nevertheless, the mIoU values of this paper's algorithm are 19.9%, 6.4%, 7.7%, and 4.2% higher than these algorithms, respectively, indicating that this algorithm maintains a good balance between accuracy and real-time performance while possessing a certain advantage in terms of accuracy. To visually depict the analysis results, this paper presents a scatter plot of the accuracy-speed comparison of these algorithms on the Camvid test set in Fig.…”
Section: Camvidmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Table 5 shows a comparison between the proposed algorithm and other excellent real-time semantic segmentation methods on the Camvid test set to validate its effectiveness further. Including deep feature aggregation network (DFANet), 43 MSFNet, 36 graph-guided architecture search for real-time semantic segmentation (GAS), 44 SFNet, 21 temporally distributed network (TDNet), 45 BiSeNetV2, 20 HyperSeg, 40 DDRNet, 15 multi-feature fusion network (MFNet), 46 cascaded selective resolution network (CSRNet), 47 and PP-LiteSeg 42 . As shown in Table 5, the mIoU value of this paper’s algorithm is 79.2%, which is second only to the mIoU value of HyperSeg-L 40 (79.7%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, various methods such as DDRNet [14], MCINet [15], SFNet [16], SPiN [17], MFNet [18] utilize multiscale and high-resolution features or employ additional modules and branches to provide advantageous guidance for recognizing small objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In training, the resolution of the input image is 512 x 512 and batch size 3 are used for training. The proposed RA-Net was designed by extending ERFNet [18] which is known for its lightweight structure. It was implemented using the PyTorch framework on a PC with NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU.…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, researchers propose to use parallel structures to capture richer contextual information. To approach this problem, Multi-Feature Fusion Network (MFNet) [19] is proposed, Which adopts parallel attention branch, semantic information acquisition branch and spatial information processing branch to process shallow and deep features. Meanwhile, asymmetric factorized (AF) blocks is used to process shallow features and deep features to obtain local and global information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%