2019
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-090x2019000200285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mexico 2018: AMLO's hour

Abstract: In July 2018, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) was elected President of Mexico in the largest electoral landslide in Mexico's democratic history. As a self-proclaimed transformational candidate, AMLO made big promises in areas of great concern for Mexican citizens: anti-corruption, criminal violence and security, and the economy. Support for AMLO remained extremely strong in 2018; however, to retain that support he will need to make concrete progress in these areas. AMLO and his party coalition face formidab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Mexico, the candidate from the Mexican Left in 2018, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, ran for the third time. In that election, unlike in the two previous processes, the political conditions were favourable for López Obrador’s victory – first, the two main political forces in the country were at odds with each other, and second, the candidate’s disruptive speech had a positive response from an electorate that felt disenchanted with the political system (Crespo, 2019; Mattiace, 2019). In this case, social networks constituted an important platform to disseminate the political platforms of the then-candidate during the presidential campaign.…”
Section: State Of the Art: Democratic Participation And Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mexico, the candidate from the Mexican Left in 2018, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, ran for the third time. In that election, unlike in the two previous processes, the political conditions were favourable for López Obrador’s victory – first, the two main political forces in the country were at odds with each other, and second, the candidate’s disruptive speech had a positive response from an electorate that felt disenchanted with the political system (Crespo, 2019; Mattiace, 2019). In this case, social networks constituted an important platform to disseminate the political platforms of the then-candidate during the presidential campaign.…”
Section: State Of the Art: Democratic Participation And Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%