2013
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2013.860754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metropolitan growth and the mobility and immobility of skilled and creative couples across the life course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, single marital status was also related to a preference for cosmopolitan cities. There likely are many reasons why single rather than married people move to cosmopolitan cities (e.g., the pursuit of excitement and entertainment, more unrestricted sexual norms, greater prevalence of desirable mates), and the correlational design of our studies does not allow us to draw causal inferences; however, the observed pattern is generally consistent with research suggesting that many people move to urban areas to find a mate (Gautier, Svarer, & Teulings, 2010; see also Cooke, 2014). In sum, social orientation and personality each explained unique variance in predicting participants' preference for cosmopolitan cities above and beyond demographic factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Last, single marital status was also related to a preference for cosmopolitan cities. There likely are many reasons why single rather than married people move to cosmopolitan cities (e.g., the pursuit of excitement and entertainment, more unrestricted sexual norms, greater prevalence of desirable mates), and the correlational design of our studies does not allow us to draw causal inferences; however, the observed pattern is generally consistent with research suggesting that many people move to urban areas to find a mate (Gautier, Svarer, & Teulings, 2010; see also Cooke, 2014). In sum, social orientation and personality each explained unique variance in predicting participants' preference for cosmopolitan cities above and beyond demographic factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Further, in regional areas, a smaller proportion of adults work in professional roles (16% compared with 24% in metropolitan areas), and in rural areas, fewer industries require employees with secondary school completion. For many dual-profession couples, the regional job market limits their inclusion, although this may vary depending on skills, interests and professional flexibility of the spouse/partner [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGranahan and Wojan 2007;Marrocu and Paci 2012); however, few have attempted to surpass the bare economic framework by studying their demographic and social characteristics (e.g. Cooke 2014;Eisler, Donnelly and Montuori 2016). Creative workers are not heterogeneous only from the aspect of the occupational structure, but they also differ according to age, gender, education, status, nationality, and others (Fritsch and Stützer 2007;Alfken, Broekel and Sternberg 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%