2008
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/3/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrology triangle using a Watt balance, a calculable capacitor and a single-electron tunnelling device

Abstract: The combination of a Watt balance, a calculable capacitor and a single-electron tunnelling device forms a triangle that yields a value for the single-electron charge quantum QS in terms of the SI coulomb. Importantly, this result is independent of the Josephson and quantum Hall effects, and thus avoids the possible confounding corrections from these two effects that arise in the traditional quantum metrology triangle. This new triangle can be used to test for corrections to the expected relation QS = e, where … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The QMT experiment and its impact has been discussed, e.g., by Piquemal and Geneves (2000), Zimmerman and Keller (2003), Piquemal (2004), Gallop (2005), Keller (2008), Keller et al (2008), Feltin and Piquemal (2009), and . In this review, we use the terms QMT setup, experiment, or measurement for any experimental setups that pursue a metrological comparison between JVS, QHR, and a quantum current source.…”
Section: Quantum Metrology Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The QMT experiment and its impact has been discussed, e.g., by Piquemal and Geneves (2000), Zimmerman and Keller (2003), Piquemal (2004), Gallop (2005), Keller (2008), Keller et al (2008), Feltin and Piquemal (2009), and . In this review, we use the terms QMT setup, experiment, or measurement for any experimental setups that pursue a metrological comparison between JVS, QHR, and a quantum current source.…”
Section: Quantum Metrology Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should note that JVS and QHR are used here only as transfer standards. Keller et al (2008) derived a result based on the NIST ECCS: Q S ¼ 1:602 176 3 Â 10 À19 AE 1:5 Â 10 À25 C. This could be compared to the CODATA value for e, which, however, depends strongly on h and the exactness of K J and R K . Instead, it is better to compare Q S to another value of e that is independent of JVS and QHR: e ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi 3 A r ðeÞM u = 0 R 1 N A p (Feltin and Piquemal, 2009).…”
Section: Metrological Implications Of Single-electron Transport and Qmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuity equation (14) together with (17), which is derived from it, provides a powerful method for calculating the uncertainty of the fundamental constants involved in any valid redefined unit system with respect to their uncertainties in SI units. In the case of a definition of the kilogram based on a fixed value of h (ie u(h´)=0), we can show that u(Λ)=u(h) and u(∆)=u(e 2 /h), whilst the uncertainty in the two electrical quantum constants (R K and K J ) is zero.…”
Section: Continuity Equations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it must also be verified with standard inductors. Three standard inductors of value 1, 10, and 10 μH were calibrated using a Maxwell-Wien bridge [5] at the frequencies 1, 2, 10, 20, and 100 kHz for 1 and 10 μH and 100 Hz, 400 Hz, and 1 kHz for 50 μH. The measurement results performed with the auto-balancing bridge were compared with the values obtained by calibrating standards with the Maxwell-Wien bridge.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Equivalent Circuit Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%