2005
DOI: 10.3141/1930-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metro Service Delay Recovery: Comparison of Strategies and Constraints Across Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, network-level rail operations require more robust control because challenges along one small part of the line can have a widespread impact on the whole transit network. In addition, the increased concern among travels means that a small operations error can attract a great deal of public attention, and the negative impacts can be magnified by internet exposure or cell phone networks if issue is not properly addressed in a timely manner [6][7][8].…”
Section: Increasing Public Travel Demand Leads To Great Challenges Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, network-level rail operations require more robust control because challenges along one small part of the line can have a widespread impact on the whole transit network. In addition, the increased concern among travels means that a small operations error can attract a great deal of public attention, and the negative impacts can be magnified by internet exposure or cell phone networks if issue is not properly addressed in a timely manner [6][7][8].…”
Section: Increasing Public Travel Demand Leads To Great Challenges Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 3 relates the temporal change of m s (k, τ ) to the diffusion, passenger flow, and routing matrix that come along with every passenger transfer t ∈ • k ∪ k • joining or leaving it, in which • k/k • denotes the set of all incoming/outgoing passenger transfers w.r.t. k. In particular, D s (t), D s : T s → {K ∈ R n×n : K[i, j] = 0 for any i = j} specifies the diffusion, φ s (t, τ ), φ s : T s × R ≥0 → R ≥0 n , the passenger flow, and R s (t), R s : T s → {K ∈ [0, 1] n×n : K[·, i] ∈ {0, 1} for any i ∈ {1, 2, .…”
Section: B Balance Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there are highly unpredictable asynchronous events for which statistical data is hard to obtain. It is thus difficult to include them in the daily network operation [3], e.g. by means of minute-by-minute or hourly forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Evans and Morrison (1997) incorporated disruption effects in economic models for public transport and Silkunas (2006) examined reimbursements by transit authorities to passengers for such cases. Some research investigated rescheduling of metro systems following a disruption: for example, a comparison of strategies and the various constraints on managing delays due to incidents in metro systems was provided by Schmocker et al (2005), while Valdes et al (2006) simulated metro operations under disruptions to evaluate different approaches for controlling such conditions. Finally, Tsuchiya et al (2006) studied passenger support following an incident and developed a decision support system (DSS) to inform passengers of alternative routes when part of a metro system went out of service and Scott et al (2006) presented a novel method for indentifying critical links of a transportation network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%