2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.10.21258580
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics to relate COVID-19 wastewater data to clinical testing dynamics

Abstract: Wastewater surveillance has emerged as a useful tool in the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. While wastewater surveillance has been applied at various scales to monitor population-level COVID-19 dynamics, there is a need for quantitative metrics to interpret wastewater data in the context of public health trends. We collected 24-hour composite wastewater samples from March 2020 through May 2021 from a Massachusetts wastewater treatment plant and measured SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations using RT-q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus conceivable that the signal captured by the WWI differs more significantly from the incidence rate during that period because the two indicators monitored different populations by that time than at the second peak of the epidemic. Such a change in the demographic of the pandemic has already been reported in the state of Massachusetts [19] and is shown in Figure 7. The correlation is still good between the two compared signals (>0.85 for every WWTP except Nancy), which is consistent with the results of [1,9,12,25,26,27,28].…”
Section: Seine Moréesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…It is thus conceivable that the signal captured by the WWI differs more significantly from the incidence rate during that period because the two indicators monitored different populations by that time than at the second peak of the epidemic. Such a change in the demographic of the pandemic has already been reported in the state of Massachusetts [19] and is shown in Figure 7. The correlation is still good between the two compared signals (>0.85 for every WWTP except Nancy), which is consistent with the results of [1,9,12,25,26,27,28].…”
Section: Seine Moréesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This section introduces the WCR metric to demonstrate the versatility of the QTA approach and constitutes Part 2 of 2 of the model QTA report. Here we adopt the interpretations provided by Xiao et al, 2021 [8] within the QTA framework and this is provided in Figure 5 and Tables 8 − 11 for the TAB sewershed longer-term QTA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wastewater to cases ratio (WCR) [8] was also considered and integrated as part of an extension to the base QTA report intended to demonstrate the versatility of the QTA methodology to integrate new metrics for additional trend analysis and insight. Table 3 provides an integration of the PHAC and WC recommended interpretations intended to supplement the CCC and WVS trend interpretations [10,11].…”
Section: Integrated Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wastewater (WW) surveillance has emerged as a method to track SARS-CoV-2 variants in a manner that is complementary to sequencing clinical samples. Wastewater-based epidemiology has the potential to variant lineages earlier than clinical sampling and provides valuable insights about the viral spread in the population (Bibby et al 2021;Xiao et al 2021). This is because wastewater sampling can catch asymptomatic cases that would otherwise not present for a nasal swab sample, but that do excrete viral RNA in stool (Bibby et al 2021;Jones et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%