2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics to evaluate compression algorithms for raw SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various radar electronic countermeasures (ECM) have been developed in recent decades to prevent the detection of sensitive targets and protected areas by enemy SAR [1,3,4]. SAR deception jamming has become popular in recent years because of its low power requirements, flexible operability, and significant damage to SAR [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various radar electronic countermeasures (ECM) have been developed in recent decades to prevent the detection of sensitive targets and protected areas by enemy SAR [1,3,4]. SAR deception jamming has become popular in recent years because of its low power requirements, flexible operability, and significant damage to SAR [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metrics to compare performance of compression algorithms [79] can be applied at the (i) data domain, which would primarily target data fidelity after decompression and (ii) image domain, which would deal with features of the image and its quality. The proposed method achieves a simultaneous decompression and decomposition of the compressed raw data and focuses on analysis of the image after SAR processing.…”
Section: Image Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%