2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics of performance relevant in methanol-to-hydrocarbons catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a product distribution suggests lower prevalence of the arene with respect to alkene-chain carries and less prominent HT reactions when the D-methanol feed is used. Since formation of polycyclic aromatics hydrocarbons (PAHs) is primarily ascribed to the overgrowth of the arene species in which HT reactions play the central role, these product distribution patterns indicate that slower catalyst deactivation in the presence of D-methanol may arise not only from its lower reactivity with respect to H-methanol, but also from the variable kinetic sensitivity of different reactions of the MTH network to these isotopologues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a product distribution suggests lower prevalence of the arene with respect to alkene-chain carries and less prominent HT reactions when the D-methanol feed is used. Since formation of polycyclic aromatics hydrocarbons (PAHs) is primarily ascribed to the overgrowth of the arene species in which HT reactions play the central role, these product distribution patterns indicate that slower catalyst deactivation in the presence of D-methanol may arise not only from its lower reactivity with respect to H-methanol, but also from the variable kinetic sensitivity of different reactions of the MTH network to these isotopologues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Review highlights the opportunities, challenges, prior learnings, and future research in the zeolites/zeotypes catalytic function for the direct conversion of CO x to valuable products via oxygenate intermediates. There are recent reviews regarding the advances in C 1 catalysis, ,, CO 2 to methanol, ,, and methanol to hydrocarbons (MTH), , demonstrating the relevance and importance of these research fields. Nonetheless, there has not yet been a critical discussion of the zeolite/zeotype catalytic function in the context of CO x valorization using tandem catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized that MTO conversion proceeds via the intricate hydrocarbon pool (HCP) mechanism in zeolites. In addition to the intrinsic Brønsted acidic sites, the retained organics, known as HCPs, act as cocatalysts to produce light olefins. , Tremendous effects have been devoted to unraveling the veil of HCPs during the reaction by a variety of characterization, computational, and kinetic investigations. In general, both aromatics and olefins have been suggested as the dominating HCPs to participate in the reaction, and the so-called aromatic-based and olefin-based cycles thus are responsible for the formation of light olefins. Both aromatic-based and olefin-based cycles are essentially the same thing and consist of (side) chain propagation and elimination of olefins. , It is currently found that the catalytic performance of the MTO conversion, especially the product distribution, depends highly on the contribution of each cycle. It was reported that the MTO selectivity directly relates to the methylation degree of the retained polymethylbenzenes (polyMBs), and the preferential stabilization of the fully methylated HCPs favors the aromatic-based paring cycle. , The olefin-based cycle, on the other hand, favors the formation of propene and higher olefins by successive methylation and cracking steps . As a consequence, the catalytic performance of the MTO conversion could be possibly optimized in a controllable manner if the distribution of HCPs and the contribution of each cycle governed by zeolite structures under operating conditions could be quantified and tailored . However, the dynamic characteristics of HCPs formed in situ engendered severe challenges to identify the structures and track the evolution of dominating HCPs in detail during the reaction, let alone the complexity of the involved reaction pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 As a consequence, the catalytic performance of the MTO conversion could be possibly optimized in a controllable manner if the distribution of HCPs and the contribution of each cycle governed by zeolite structures under operating conditions could be quantified and tailored. 46 However, the dynamic characteristics of HCPs formed in situ engendered severe challenges to identify the structures and track the evolution of dominating HCPs in detail during the reaction, let alone the complexity of the involved reaction pathways. First-principles microkinetic simulations have offered great merits to establish the relations between the energetics calculated at the atomic scale and the catalytic performances at the macroscopic scale in heterogeneous catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%