Metrics and key performance indicators for robotic cybersecurity performance analysis

Zimmerman, Timothy

doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8177

Cited by 17 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The system uses the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem [9] a real-world industrial chemical 1211 manufacturing process, as the simulation model for the chemical reaction. The system integrates 1212 the control algorithm developed by Ricker [10] to control the simulated chemical reaction.…”

Section: Process-based Manufacturing Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile Low Security Level Example Implementations Guide

Cichonski¹

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There may be references in this publication to other publications currently under development by NIST in accordance 63 with its assigned statutory responsibilities. The information in this publication, including concepts and methodologies, 64 may be used by federal agencies even before the completion of such companion publications. Thus, until each 65 publication is completed, current requirements, guidelines, and procedures, where they exist, remain operative. For 66 planning and transition purposes, federal agencies may wish to closely follow the development of these new 67 publications by NIST. 68Organizations are encouraged to review all draft publications during public comment periods and provide feedback to 69 NIST. Many NIST cybersecurity publications, other than the ones noted above, are available at 70 https://csrc.nist.gov/publications.

show abstract

Section: Process-based Manufacturing Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile Low Security Level Example Implementations Guide

Cichonski¹

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Manufacturing Profile implementation will be performed on the Cybersecurity for Smart Manufacturing Systems testbed [2], located at the NIST campus in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The testbed contains two manufacturing systems: the Collaborative Robotics System (CRS) [3], and the Process Control System (PCS) [4]. The CRS is a discrete manufacturing process, while the PCS is a continuous manufacturing process.…”

Section: Cybersecurity For Smart Manufacturing Systems Testbedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CRS workcell, shown in Figure 1, contains two robotic arms that perform a material handling process called machine tending [3]. Robotic machine tending utilizes robots to interact with machinery, performing physical operations a human operator would normally perform (e.g., loading and unloading of parts in a machine, opening and closing of machine doors, interacting with the operator control panel, etc.).…”

Section: Cybersecurity For Smart Manufacturing Systems Testbedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each of these systems are listed in Table 4, and are further described in the following subsections. As noted in [3], the high-level production measurements give an indication if the manufacturing process performance is impacted, but these measurements alone are not be able to identify the underlying cause. To solve this problem, numerous other low-level measurements are captured beyond the manufacturing process performance (e.g., raw network traffic, time-stamped events from machining stations).…”

Section: Testbed Measurement Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Manufacturing profile implementation methodology for a robotic workcell

Zimmerman¹

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has constructed a testbed to measure the performance impact of cybersecurity technologies on Industrial Control Systems (ICS). The testbed was chosen to support the implementation of the Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile: a voluntary, risk-based approach for managing cybersecurity activities and reducing cyber risk to manufacturing systems. This report focuses on the Collaborative Robotics System, one of the two manufacturing systems within the testbed. A methodology for implementation of technical solutions to meet the Profile language is described, as well as a comprehensive review of the testbed measurement systems, and the comparative analysis procedures used for identifying performance impacts. Finally, an example comparative analysis is performed and the characterization of the workcell is discussed.

show abstract

“…[4] In other words, a KPI is a computed value based on post-analysis and may utilize one or many primitive values to perform the computation.…”

Section: Definitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Key performance indicators for process control system cybersecurity performance analysis

Tang¹

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metrics and key performance indicators for robotic cybersecurity performance analysis

Cited by 17 publications

References 2 publications

Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile Low Security Level Example Implementations Guide

Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile Low Security Level Example Implementations Guide

Manufacturing profile implementation methodology for a robotic workcell

Key performance indicators for process control system cybersecurity performance analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About