Medical Imaging 2019: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2511720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metric-based evaluation of fiducial markers for medical procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an offset in the millimeter range, we yielded comparable results to those in the previously published literature. 8 As part of the project, other marker libraries such as ArUco were tested, 19 but the experience eventually favored Vuforia. For a future perspective, the use of infrared marker spheres is currently under investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an offset in the millimeter range, we yielded comparable results to those in the previously published literature. 8 As part of the project, other marker libraries such as ArUco were tested, 19 but the experience eventually favored Vuforia. For a future perspective, the use of infrared marker spheres is currently under investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m are the centroids of ground truth landmarks and n are the centroids of physically measured fiducial points (N total points) after performing registration between these spaces. Using the ArUco library, experimental measures of FRE range from 0.27-0.91 mm for 40 cm and 100 cm viewing distances, respectively, with rotational errors between 1.0-3.8 degrees [42]. By combining the contributions from ArUco marker tracking, we expect a similar FRE of 0.27-0.91 mm for our proposed viewing distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Nowadays, fiducial tags such as ARTags, AprilTags, or ArUcos are used (see Figure 2a), that all have their strengths and weaknesses as investigated, for example, in [62][63][64][65][66]. In this work, AprilTags are used as they perform comparably well in terms of accurate and robust pose detections; see, for example, [67]. AprilTags [68][69][70] are special types of visual fiducial tags such as barcodes or QR-codes.…”
Section: Visual Fiducial Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%