Abstract:SYNOPSIS
88 patients in need of prophylactic treatment for classical, common or mixed migraine of at least 2years' duration were admitted to a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of the beta1‐selective adrenoceptorblocker, metoprolol. All patients initially took placebo for 1 month, during which 29 were excludedprincipally because of failure to reattend or placebo‐response making active treatment unnecessary. Theremaining 59 patients were randomised to continued placebo or metoprolol 50 mg b.i.d. for 2 month… Show more
“…Propranolol is considered to be the reference prophylactic treatment for migraine. Other β-blockers which have demonstrated superior efficacy for migraine prophylaxis compared to placebo include metoprolol (Kangasniemi et al 1987; Steiner et al 1988), timolol (Tfelt-Hansen and Olesen 1984; Stellar et al 1984), altenolol (Forssman et al 1983; Johannsson et al 1987) and nadolol (Freitag and Diamond 1984). Comparable efficacy to propranolol has been shown for all four of these drugs (Kangasniemi and Hedman 1984; Olsson et al 1984; Tfelt-Hansen and Olesen 1984; Stensrud and Sjaastad 1980; Ryan 1984; Sudilovsky et al 1987).…”
Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine have resulted in important breakthroughs in treatment. For example, understanding of the role of serotonin in the cerebrovascular circulation has led to the development of triptans for the acute relief of migraine headaches, and the identifi cation of cortical spreading depression as an early central event associated wih migraine has brought renewed interest in antiepileptic drugs for migraine prophylaxis. However, migraine still remains inadequately treated. Indeed, it is apparent that migraine is not a single disease but rather a syndrome that can manifest itself in a variety of pathological conditions. The consequences of this may be that treatment needs to be matched to particular patients. Clinical research needs to be devoted to identifying which sort of patients benefi t best from which treatments, particularly in the fi eld of prophylaxis. We propose four patterns of precipitating factors (adrenergic, serotoninergic, menstrual, and muscular) which may be used to structure migraine prophylaxis. Finally, little is known about long-term outcome in treated migraine. It is possible that appropriate early prophylaxis may modify the long-term course of the disease and avoid late complications.
“…Propranolol is considered to be the reference prophylactic treatment for migraine. Other β-blockers which have demonstrated superior efficacy for migraine prophylaxis compared to placebo include metoprolol (Kangasniemi et al 1987; Steiner et al 1988), timolol (Tfelt-Hansen and Olesen 1984; Stellar et al 1984), altenolol (Forssman et al 1983; Johannsson et al 1987) and nadolol (Freitag and Diamond 1984). Comparable efficacy to propranolol has been shown for all four of these drugs (Kangasniemi and Hedman 1984; Olsson et al 1984; Tfelt-Hansen and Olesen 1984; Stensrud and Sjaastad 1980; Ryan 1984; Sudilovsky et al 1987).…”
Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine have resulted in important breakthroughs in treatment. For example, understanding of the role of serotonin in the cerebrovascular circulation has led to the development of triptans for the acute relief of migraine headaches, and the identifi cation of cortical spreading depression as an early central event associated wih migraine has brought renewed interest in antiepileptic drugs for migraine prophylaxis. However, migraine still remains inadequately treated. Indeed, it is apparent that migraine is not a single disease but rather a syndrome that can manifest itself in a variety of pathological conditions. The consequences of this may be that treatment needs to be matched to particular patients. Clinical research needs to be devoted to identifying which sort of patients benefi t best from which treatments, particularly in the fi eld of prophylaxis. We propose four patterns of precipitating factors (adrenergic, serotoninergic, menstrual, and muscular) which may be used to structure migraine prophylaxis. Finally, little is known about long-term outcome in treated migraine. It is possible that appropriate early prophylaxis may modify the long-term course of the disease and avoid late complications.
“…In placebokontrollierten Studien konnte eine migräneprophylaktische Wirksamkeit für Propanolol [13,18,22,23,37,38,44,52,55,57,61,74,78,79], Metoprolol [3,29,30,37,52,68,73,75,77], Timolol [65,74], Nadolol [55] und Atenolol [36,61] …”
Migraine prophylaxis with drugs is still an essential part of migraine therapy. This is especially true for those patients with frequent migraines who are in danger of developing drug-induced headaches. Migraine prophylaxis should be taken in consideration in patients who suffer from 7 or more migraine days per month in spite of all non-pharmacological efforts. When choosing a prophylactic drug not only efficacy but tolerability and safety for long-term intake should be considered. Prophylactic drugs used to be classified as drugs of first, second and third choice. According to this step care model treatment was started with a drug of first choice and only in case of lack of efficacy or adverse events a drug of lower choice was selected. Today, in contrast to the traditional step care a stratified care is favored. Treatment is individualized based on an assessment of the patients' medical needs, on comorbidity, the migraine phenotype and most importantly the individual situation of the patient in life. The paper gives an overview of the efficacy and tolerability of drugs used in migraine prophylaxis.
“…Sicher wirksam für die Prophylaxe der Migräne sind der nicht-selektive Beta-Blocker Propranolol [36] und der Beta-1-selektive Beta-Blocker Metoprolol [40,57,75,77] (Tabelle 7). Bisoprolol ist wahrscheinlich ebenfalls wirksam, wurde aber nur in wenigen Studien untersucht [97,105].…”
Section: Substanzen Zur Migräneprophylaxeunclassified
Die Inzidenz der Migräne beträgt 6-8% für Männer und 12-14% für Frauen. Die Attacken gehen mit pulsierenden, pochenden, halbseitigen Kopfschmerzen und vegetativen Begleiterscheinungen einher. Bei ca. 15% der Patienten kommt es vor den Kopfschmerzen zu einer Aura, meist mit visuellen Symptomen.Leichte und mittelschwere Migräneattacken werden mit der Kombination eines prokinetischen Antiemetikums wie Metoclopramid oder Domperidon und einem ausreichend dosierten Analgetikum (Azetylsalizylsäure, Paracetamol, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, Diclofenac) behandelt. Mittelschwere und schwere Migräneattacken werden mit den modernen 5-HT 1B/D -Rezeptoragonisten ("Triptane") behandelt. Die Kombination eines Antiemetikums und Ergotamintartrat ist weniger wirksam als die "Triptane".Patienten mit häufigen oder schweren Migräneattacken benötigen eine medikamentöse und nicht-medikamentöse Prophylaxe. Medikamente der ersten Wahl sind die Beta-Rezeptorenblocker Metoprolol oder Propranolol und der Kalziumantagonist Flunarizin. Substanzen der zweiten Wahl sind Valproinsäure und nicht-steroidale Antirheumatika. Bei den nichtmedikamentösen Therapien sind multimodale Therapieansätze, die Techniken der progressiven Muskelrelaxation, kognitive Techniken, Stress-und Reizverabreitungstraining und Schmerzbewältigungstechniken verbinden, sowie die Sporttherapie (aerobes Ausdauertraining) wirksam.Die Deutsche Migräne-und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft hat letztmals 1997 Therapieempfehlungen für die Behandlung der Migräne veröffentlicht [16]. Seitdem sind mehrere neue 5-HT 1B/1D -agonisten ("Triptane") zugelassen und zahlreiche Studien zur Akuttherapie und Prophylaxe der Migräne publiziert worden. Die Therapieempfehlungen orientieren sich formal an den ᭤ Kriterien der evidence-based medicine. Die Kategorien der Evidenz wurden von der Arzneimittelkommission der Deutschen Ärzteschaft übernommen. Sie sind wie folgt definiert: ›› Aussage zur Wirksamkeit wird gestützt durch mehrere adäquate, valide klinische Studien (z.B. randomisierte klinische Studien) bzw. durch eine oder mehrere valide Metaanalysen oder systematische Reviews. Positive Aussage gut belegt. › Aussage zur Wirksamkeit wird gestützt durch zumindest eine adäqute, valide klinische Studie (z.B. randomisierte klinische Studie). Positive Aussage belegt. 269 ᭤ Kriterien der evidence-based medicine Schmerz 2000 · 14:269-283
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.