2014
DOI: 10.5007/1980-0037.2014v16n4p419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Métodos alternativos para estimar a velocidade da máxima fase estável de lactato em adultos jovens fisicamente ativos

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the velocities found in the protocols used to measure the indirect individual anaerobic threshold (IAT ind ), glucose threshold (GT) and critical velocity (CV) with the gold standard, the maximum lactate steady state (MLSS) protocol. Fourteen physically active young adults (23±3.1 years; 72±10.97 kg; 176±7 cm; 21±5.36% body fat) performed a 3000-m track running test to determine IAT ind using the prediction equation and an incremental test on a treadmill to determine GT. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 36 studies, 31 were peer reviewed (26,28,34,37–39,47,48,61,70,71,78,83,85,86,90,91,98,102–104,107,109,110,112,117,119,120,123–125) and 5 were “gray literature” including 1 conference abstract (45) and 4 thesis or dissertations or monographs (15,32,64,121). Studies' main characteristics regarding MLSS and CP testing protocols and the observed study-level effect sizes (trueμ^CPMLSS and trueσ^CPMLSS) are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 36 studies, 31 were peer reviewed (26,28,34,37–39,47,48,61,70,71,78,83,85,86,90,91,98,102–104,107,109,110,112,117,119,120,123–125) and 5 were “gray literature” including 1 conference abstract (45) and 4 thesis or dissertations or monographs (15,32,64,121). Studies' main characteristics regarding MLSS and CP testing protocols and the observed study-level effect sizes (trueμ^CPMLSS and trueσ^CPMLSS) are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%