2008
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MethyQESD, a robust and fast method for quantitative methylation analyses in HNPCC diagnostics using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples

Abstract: Promoter hypermethylation occurs in various tumors and leads to silencing of tumor-relevant genes. Thus, promoter methylation analysis (MA) has been established as an important tool in cancer research and diagnostics. Here we present MethyQESD (methylation-quantification of endonuclease-resistant DNA) as a fast, easy, precise and reliable method for quantitative MA without the need of bisulfite-treatment or fluorescent probes. Though MethyQESD principally works with any gene promoter we established MethyQESD f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Promoter methylation of the DUSP4 gene was analyzed in six CRC cell lines (HCT116, SW480, HT29, SW48, CaCo2 and LoVo) and tumor as well as matched normal tissue of 11 CRC patients according to the Methy‐QESD method 27. Genomic DNA was isolated using the MagNAPure LC system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promoter methylation of the DUSP4 gene was analyzed in six CRC cell lines (HCT116, SW480, HT29, SW48, CaCo2 and LoVo) and tumor as well as matched normal tissue of 11 CRC patients according to the Methy‐QESD method 27. Genomic DNA was isolated using the MagNAPure LC system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promoter methylation analysis (MA), using methylation-specific digestion enzyme and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was done according to the guidelines provided by Bettstetter et al (2008). Two restriction digestion batches were prepared for every sample: (1) methylation quantification digestion (MQD), (2) methylation-independent calibrator digestion (CalD).…”
Section: Methylation-specific Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the MethyQESD technique (36), previous studies used methods such as bisulfite-conversion, which bears the risk of incomplete conversion of unmethylated cytosines (39), leading to an overestimation of methylation. Furthermore, the use of methylation specific primers without enough discrimination capacity between methylated and unmethylated DNA can also result in false positive methylation results (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation analysis was performed using MethyQESD (36), a combination of methylation-sensitive digestion and qPCR. A methylation specific quantification digestion (MQD) containing 40 units (U) of the methylation-sensitive endonuclease, Hin6I (Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and a calibrator digestion (CalD) containing the methylation-independent endonucleases, XBaI (20 U) and DraI (20 U) (Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), were set up for each sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%