2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-015-0128-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylome profiling reveals functions and genes which are differentially methylated in serrated compared to conventional colorectal carcinoma

Abstract: BackgroundSerrated adenocarcinoma (SAC) is a recently recognized colorectal cancer (CRC) subtype accounting for 7.5–8.7 % of CRCs. It has been shown that SAC has a worse prognosis and different histological and molecular features compared to conventional carcinoma (CC) but, to date, there is no study analysing its methylome profile.ResultsThe methylation status of 450,000 CpG sites using the Infinium Human Methylation 450 BeadChip array was investigated in 103 colorectal specimens, including 39 SACs and 34 mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting loss of mismatch repair capacity leads to microsatellite instability (MSI) or further dysregulation of methylation control over cell cycle (CIMP-positive), allowing uncontrolled cell proliferation [16]. Compared to conventional carcinomas, serrated adenocarcinomas from the Garcia-Solano et al [15] study are more likely to be CIMP high (9% vs. 30%, respectively p = 0.0035) [17]. Recent data show that SSA/Ps in the proximal region (right-side) of the colon are associated with a three to four-fold increased risk of concurrent advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting loss of mismatch repair capacity leads to microsatellite instability (MSI) or further dysregulation of methylation control over cell cycle (CIMP-positive), allowing uncontrolled cell proliferation [16]. Compared to conventional carcinomas, serrated adenocarcinomas from the Garcia-Solano et al [15] study are more likely to be CIMP high (9% vs. 30%, respectively p = 0.0035) [17]. Recent data show that SSA/Ps in the proximal region (right-side) of the colon are associated with a three to four-fold increased risk of concurrent advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions included:

Left-sided SSA/P ( n = 16) and HP specimens ( n = 34: 55% left-sided, 45% right-sided) from the NH Colonoscopy Registry cohort.

Colorectal cancers described in Garcia-Solano et al GEO (GSE68060) [15] ( n = 17 serrated adenocarcinomas vs. n = 11 adjacent normal mucosal samples from the Spanish cohort and n = 17 serrated adenocarcinomas vs. n = 4 adjacent normal mucosal samples from the Finnish cohort). Features used to diagnose serrated adenocarcinoma included “epithelial serrations, clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm, abundant cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, absence of, or less than 10% necrosis of the total surface area, mucin production and cell balls and papillary rods in mucinous areas of a tumour” [17,37,38].

Additional colorectal cancer samples that showed high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) ( n = 9), as well as n = 6 normal samples from Garcia-Solano et al [15].

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the loss of E-cadherin expression and the increase in mesenchymal markers are more evident in SAC than in CC [19]. These histological and immunohistochemical manifestations of the invasive activity of SAC tumor cells were further confirmed by analyzing the molecular signatures of SAC compared to CC, where functions associated with cytoskeleton rearrangement and small GTPases' activity were frequently enriched in SAC [12,20]. Intriguingly, the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in SAC does not seem to involve the canonical Wnt/β-catenin, as the nuclear expression of β-catenin was lower in SAC than in CC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Previous studies comparing SAC and CC molecular signatures have highlighted that antiapoptosis-, neural differentiation-, GTPases-, calcium signalling-and cytoskeleton-related functions, are characteristic of SAC. 15,27,28 Given its role as part of a receptor complex for a small neuropeptide, and its participation in the regulation of GTPase function, in calcium signalling, and in granulocytic differentiation, [29][30][31] CRCP was chosen to validate the microarray result of it being up-regulated in SAC as compared with hmMSI-H. In agreement with the array, CRCP was overexpressed in SAC as assessed by qPCR, although we could not validate this finding at the protein level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%