1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.100313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylglyoxal(bis‐guanylhydrazone) inhibition of organogenesis is not due to S‐adenosylmethionine decarboxylase inhibition/polyamine depletion in tobacco thin layers

Abstract: Previous results indicated that in shoot‐forming tobacco thin layers the putative inhibitor of S‐adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC, EC 4.1.1.21) activity methylglyoxal(bis‐guanylhydrazone) (MGBG) inhibited meristemoid/primordia formation while enhancing conjugated polyamine accumulation and ethylene biosynthesis, thus showing an inverse relationship between the two phenomena ( Scaramagli et al. 1999). In order to better understand how MGBG causes polyamine overproduction and by using the same model syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, MGBG does not behave as a SAMDC inhibitor in tobacco cells, and both intracellular polyamine levels and SAMDC activity increased when treated with MGBG (Hiatt et al, 1986;Scaramagli et al, 1999). Although MGBG inhibits in vitro SAMDC activity, the effects of MGBG on endogenous polyamine levels are contradictory and seem to be dependent upon the plant material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, MGBG does not behave as a SAMDC inhibitor in tobacco cells, and both intracellular polyamine levels and SAMDC activity increased when treated with MGBG (Hiatt et al, 1986;Scaramagli et al, 1999). Although MGBG inhibits in vitro SAMDC activity, the effects of MGBG on endogenous polyamine levels are contradictory and seem to be dependent upon the plant material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…MGBG as an inhibitor of SAMDC, was supposed to induce a similar increase in Put but this was not confirmed in rice and this inhibitor therefore could not be recommended for this purpose. It has been reported by Scaramagli et al (1999) that in some experimental systems, MGBG is not specific for inhibition of SAMDC and does not always lead to Put accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Putrescine oxidising (DAO, EC 1.4.3.6) activity was assayed by a radiometric method based on the production of [ 14 C]Δ 1 ‐pyrroline from labelled putrescine as previously described (Scaramagli et al. , 1999a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%