1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01685544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl parathion and carbaryl resistance inChrysomela scripta andColeomegilla maculata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic chemicals remain an effective short-term option (1; D.R. Coyle, personal observation), but complete reliance on this method could lead to pesticide resistance, ecological disturbances, and eventual loss of this tool as a component of IPM plans (55).…”
Section: Hardwood Tree Genera and Their Most Important Arthropod Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic chemicals remain an effective short-term option (1; D.R. Coyle, personal observation), but complete reliance on this method could lead to pesticide resistance, ecological disturbances, and eventual loss of this tool as a component of IPM plans (55).…”
Section: Hardwood Tree Genera and Their Most Important Arthropod Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvements are better for clone 91 Â 04-03 than for D105. However, Sevin can have detrimental impacts on some natural enemies (Smith and Krischik, 2000), including Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a ladybird beetle known to inhabit intensively managed hardwood plantations and prey on C. scripta (Head et al, 1977;Jarrard, 1997; DRC, personal observation). One promising avenue for decreasing pest management costs as well as harm to beneficial insects during the first part of the rotation is the use of the systemic insecticide imidacloprid (Tenczar and Krischik, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Much like herbivores, individuals of C. maculata show resistance to insecticides in heavily-treated areas (Head et al, 1977;Graves et al, 1978). Models have demonstrated that high levels of gene flow (more than 10 per cent) between treated and untreated fields can retard the evolution of resistance in treated fields, on the one hand, and increase the frequency of resistance alleles in untreated fields, on the other (Caprio & Tabashnik, 1992b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%