2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl chloride and C2–C5 hydrocarbon emissions from dry leaf litter and their dependence on temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is believed to account for the majority of ethene production from rice fields, as evidenced from control experiment fluxes (Redeker et al, 2003). A separate abiotic production mechanism for ethene and propene has recently been reported from dry leaf litter, with emission rates increasing with temperature (Derendorp et al, 2011). However, these abiotic production rates were estimated to be insignificant in their global budgets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This process is believed to account for the majority of ethene production from rice fields, as evidenced from control experiment fluxes (Redeker et al, 2003). A separate abiotic production mechanism for ethene and propene has recently been reported from dry leaf litter, with emission rates increasing with temperature (Derendorp et al, 2011). However, these abiotic production rates were estimated to be insignificant in their global budgets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, current estimates of the CH 3 Cl global budget and the apportionment between sources and sinks are still highly uncertain. Known natural sources of CH 3 Cl include tropical plants (Yokouchi et al, 2002(Yokouchi et al, , 2007Umezawa et al, 2015), wood-rotting fungi (Harper, 1985), oceans (Moore et al, 1996;Kolusu et al, 2017), plants of salt marshes (Rhew et al, 2000(Rhew et al, , 2003, aerated and flooded soil (Redeker et al, 2000;Keppler et al, 2000), senescent leaves and leaf litter (Hamilton et al, 2003;Derendorp et al, 2011) and wildfires. Anthropogenic CH 3 Cl release to the atmosphere comes from the combustion of coal and biomass with minor emissions from cattle (Williams et al, 1999) and humans (Keppler et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially powerful tool in the investigation of the budgets of atmospheric volatile organic compounds is the use of stable isotope ratios (Brenninkmeijer et al, 2003;Gensch et al, 2014). The general approach is that the atmospheric isotope ratio of a compound (e.g., CH 3 Cl) is considered to be equal the sum of isotopic fluxes from all sources corrected for kinetic isotopic fractionations that happen in sink processes:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current estimates of the CH 3 Cl global budget and the apportionment between sources and sinks are still highly uncertain. Known natural sources of CH 3 Cl include tropical plants (Yokouchi et al, 2002(Yokouchi et al, , 2007Umezawa et al, 2015), wood-rotting fungi (Harper, 1985), oceans (Moore et al, 1996;Kolusu et al, 2017), plants of salt marshes (Rhew et al, 2000(Rhew et al, , 2003, aerated and flooded soil (Redeker et al, 2000;Keppler et al, 2000), senescent leaves and leaf litter Derendorp et al, 2011) and wildfires. Anthropogenic CH 3 Cl release to the atmosphere comes from the combustion of coal and biomass with minor emissions from cattle (Williams et al, 1999) and humans (Keppler et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%