2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and Cyperus control in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has demonstrated that 1,3-D + Pic is comparable with MBr + Pic for nematode control in vegetable crops, which agrees with the results found in the current study (Gilreath et al, 2004). Similarly, Gilreath et al (2005), in discussing a long-term study of fumigants on bell pepper, found that MNa + Pic was equally effective as MBr + Pic in bell pepper for sting nematode control, and provided similar fruit weight. Although high rates of propylene oxide have shown promising results against sting nematode populations in tomato (Santos and Gilreath, 2005), this fumigant underperformed for strawberry in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous research has demonstrated that 1,3-D + Pic is comparable with MBr + Pic for nematode control in vegetable crops, which agrees with the results found in the current study (Gilreath et al, 2004). Similarly, Gilreath et al (2005), in discussing a long-term study of fumigants on bell pepper, found that MNa + Pic was equally effective as MBr + Pic in bell pepper for sting nematode control, and provided similar fruit weight. Although high rates of propylene oxide have shown promising results against sting nematode populations in tomato (Santos and Gilreath, 2005), this fumigant underperformed for strawberry in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Commercial vegetable and strawberry production in Florida relies on the use of soil fumigation for control or suppression of soil-borne pathogens, nematodes and weeds. Growers historically relied on methyl bromide and chloropicrin combinations for pest control primarily because methyl bromide volatilized rapidly, moved readily through the soil, and controlled a broad spectrum of pests across a wide range of environmental conditions (Duniway, 2002;Gilreath et al, 2005;Locascio et al, 1997;Noling and Becker, 1994). It was classified as an ozone depleting chemical in 1993 under the Montreal Protocol and subsequent production in the U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for alternative chemical treatments has included evaluation of new or old materials and alternative application methods for currently registered or nonregistered fumigants that have potential to be alternatives to MBr. Metam sodium (MS), 1,3dichloropropene (1,3-D), and Pic are currently registered in the United States and have provided nematode, pathogen, or weed control in trials in various production systems (DeCal et al, 2004;Gilreath et al, 2005;Karlik et al, 2001;Mann et al, 2005;Stanghellini et al, 2003). Nematode contol results in the literature with drip-applied MS are inconsistent (Overman, 1982;Overman et al, 1987;Roberts et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%