1983
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270183008604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methoxyxanthobilirubinic acid methyl ester (methyl 3-{5-[(3-ethyl-5-methoxy-4-methyl-2H-pyrrol-2-ylidene)methyl]-2,4-dimethyl-3-pyrrolyl}propanoate), C19H26N2O3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimentally determined nitrogennitrogen distance and methine bridge angle of methoxyxanthobilirubinic acid methyl ester are 2.718 Å and 127°, respectively. 34 These values compare well with those calculated for monomeric HMPM, i.e., 2.777 Å and 126.6°, respectively. Further details of the structural differences between HMPM monomer and dimer will be discussed in a subsequent paper.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimentally determined nitrogennitrogen distance and methine bridge angle of methoxyxanthobilirubinic acid methyl ester are 2.718 Å and 127°, respectively. 34 These values compare well with those calculated for monomeric HMPM, i.e., 2.777 Å and 126.6°, respectively. Further details of the structural differences between HMPM monomer and dimer will be discussed in a subsequent paper.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This conclusion is supported by the good agreement between the calculated structure of the HMPM monomer with the crystal structure of a related pyrromethene, i.e., methoxyxanthobilirubinic acid methyl ester, which exhibits a similar intramolecular hydrogen bond. The experimentally determined nitrogen−nitrogen distance and methine bridge angle of methoxyxanthobilirubinic acid methyl ester are 2.718 Å and 127°, respectively . These values compare well with those calculated for monomeric HMPM, i.e., 2.777 Å and 126.6°, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Interestingly, the 148.78 C4-C5-C6 angle in the free-base 1 is much larger than in the known free-bases 7 28 34 (within the range 132.18-136.08), despite the fact that all bear hydrogen atoms at the meso position. The significantly different sizes in the C4-C5-C6 angle are presumably a consequence of (i) the substituents that Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In these molecules the intramolecular N···N distances are found to be ca. 0.15 Å shorter than in HMPM crystals. , Also the two additional intermolecular hydrogen bonds that are formed within the dimeric entity are weaker compared to hydrogen bonds between secondary amines and sp 2 hybridized nitrogen atoms as these systems display distinctly shorter N···N distances (2.96 ± 0.13 Å) . Thus, formation of HMPM dimers is determined by the tradeoff of two opposing effects, i.e., the energy gain due to formation of additional albeit relatively weak intermolecular hydrogen bonds and the energy loss due to weakening of the intramolecular hydrogen bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%