2021
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods used to measure maternal mortality in Sub‐Saharan Africa from 1980 to 2020: A systematic literature review

Abstract: Maternal deaths-the deaths of women during pregnancy or within 42 days of pregnancy termination-remain a major global health problem. 1 Maternal mortality has been at the top of global health agendas since the 1980s when the Safe Motherhood initiative started. 2 The agenda was reaffirmed in the 1990s when the UN launched the Millennium Development Goals, and Goal 5 called for a 75% reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One contributing factor was limited access to antibiotics [ 125 ]. Community health centers and referral hospitals must have trained and motivated healthcare providers [ 126 ], access to equipment, essential drugs, and blood transfusions delivered by experienced staff at all hours [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One contributing factor was limited access to antibiotics [ 125 ]. Community health centers and referral hospitals must have trained and motivated healthcare providers [ 126 ], access to equipment, essential drugs, and blood transfusions delivered by experienced staff at all hours [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods are used in Africa to estimate maternal mortality: demographic surveillance studies; health record review studies; confidential inquiries into maternal deaths and maternal death surveillance and response systems; prospective cohort studies; reproductive-age mortality surveys (RAMOS); direct or indirect sisterhood methods; mixed methods; and mathematical modeling. Maternal mortality ratios produced by sisterhood method studies and RAMOS studies that combined institutional records and community data are more compatible with the estimations of international organizations [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2018–2019 MMR estimate of 217 (95% CI: 164 to 269) is considerably lower than MICS’ 462 (95% CI: 288 to 538) and MMEIG’s 458 (95% CI: 360 to 577) estimates which used different methods. MICS used the sisterhood method (asking all adult respondents about the deaths of their sisters) to identify pregnancy-related deaths in a household survey that sampled enumeration areas (survey clusters) from the country’s provinces and estimated a 7-year (2013 to 2019) MMR 69 70 70–72 72. MMEIG used country data from different sources (CRVS, population-based sisterhood surveys, confidential enquiries into maternal deaths, RAMOS and any other sources that have clear data collection methods), along with robust statistical modelling 6 7 69 73…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our literature review indicated that few countries had estimated MMR using RAMOS methods and CRVS data in SSA [ 46 ]. Adomako in Ghana and Mgawadere in Malawi used the RAMOS method to estimate MMR for a district [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%