2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to Quantify the Utility of NDT in Bridge Reassessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the testing system provides a signal, the signal-response POD is applicable, in which the evaluation relates the defect size (a) to the indication / signal-response (â). Th evaluation of POD requires a certain number of data, which can be based on practical demonstrations on specimens enriched by numerical simulations [115], [116], [117] .…”
Section: Reliability Of Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the testing system provides a signal, the signal-response POD is applicable, in which the evaluation relates the defect size (a) to the indication / signal-response (â). Th evaluation of POD requires a certain number of data, which can be based on practical demonstrations on specimens enriched by numerical simulations [115], [116], [117] .…”
Section: Reliability Of Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the ultrasonic and ground penetrating radar (GPR) inspections emphasized in this paper, it should be noted that the quantification of accuracy in locating construction elements inside the concrete such as reinforcement or tendons implies that the objects of interest could be reliably detected objectively. The development of probability of detection (POD)‐curves can yield valuable conclusions in this context 16–18 . POD is delimited in the present article.…”
Section: Concept and Significance Of Measurement Uncertainty In Stochastic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, the focus is on a brief description of the interface between structural inspections as a reliable source of information and the structural analysis as a source of demand. Details about the measurement uncertainty calculation and the structural reassessment itself can be found in [27].…”
Section: On-site Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6: Results of the sensitivity analyses performed prior to any testing (on the left) to identify the crucial structure parameters and results of the NDT-supported reliability assessment (on the right) using the on-site measured shear stirrups spacing. [27], compiled.…”
Section: On-site Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%