2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to estimate underlying blood pressure: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Abstract: Antihypertensive medications complicate studies of blood pressure (BP) natural history; BP if untreated (“underlying BP”) needs to be estimated. Our objectives were to compare validity of five missing data imputation methods to estimate underlying BP and longitudinal associations of underlying BP and age. We simulated BP treatment in untreated hypertensive participants from Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) in visits 1–5 (1987–2013) using matched treated hypertensive participants. The underlying BP wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Covariate-time interaction terms were also used as covariates. To consider underlying risks related to blood pressure, values of 10 and 5 mmHg were constantly added to systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, in participants treated for hypertension [19,20]. Adjusted means and 95% con dence intervals for annual eGFR changes were estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariate-time interaction terms were also used as covariates. To consider underlying risks related to blood pressure, values of 10 and 5 mmHg were constantly added to systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, in participants treated for hypertension [19,20]. Adjusted means and 95% con dence intervals for annual eGFR changes were estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariate-time interaction terms were also used as covariates. To consider underlying risks related to blood pressure, values of 10 and 5 mmHg were constantly added to systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, in participants treated for hypertension [20,21]. Adjusted means and 95% con dence intervals for annual eGFR changes were estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, covariatetime interaction terms were used as covariates. To consider underlying risks related to blood pressure, values of 10 and 5 mmHg were constantly added to systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, in participants treated for hypertension [20,21]. Adjusted means and 95% con dence intervals (CIs) for annual changes in eGFR were estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%