1991
DOI: 10.1016/1040-6190(91)90171-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of valuing environmental externalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Many researchers in the field (and the authors of this report) think that direct damage estimates reflect the actual activity better than do indirect proxy values such as those put forth by Chernick and Caverhill (1991).…”
Section: Application Of Lave's Values To Asian Situationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• Many researchers in the field (and the authors of this report) think that direct damage estimates reflect the actual activity better than do indirect proxy values such as those put forth by Chernick and Caverhill (1991).…”
Section: Application Of Lave's Values To Asian Situationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…But the marginal cost of control is probably lower than the true societal value of reducing an externality at the margin. Thus, the externality estimates generated through the use of the marginal cost of abatement are considered conservative (low) estimates of the actual marginal values of reducing the externalities (Chernick and Caverhill 1991). Nevertheless, the basic cost of c3ntrols in Asian countries, where air quality is much poorer and daily exposure to risk is much greater, may serve as an appropriate starting point in assessing damage costs.…”
Section: 32 Factors Related To Valuation Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depth discussions on sources, effects, and the need to reduce air pollution due to the electric power generation are offered in many papers . Moreover, the last of these references presents a detailed description of environmental externalities evaluation, while Chernick and Caverhill analyzed 4 basic evaluation methods. In Holstein and Brands and Bernow et al, the effects of environmental externalities are discussed focusing the economic decisions on planning and operation of the electric power generation system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Massachusetts, New York, and California set disparate externality adders, none of which is closely tied to estimates of the economic benefits of abatement (see for example Ref. 19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%