Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1975
DOI: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.app4.1975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of Sample Preparation and X-Ray Diffraction Data Analysis, X-Ray Mineralogy Laboratory, Deep Sea Drilling Project, University of California, Riverside

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten powdered sediment samples from each site were mounted as unoriented powder by the backside method (Brindley and Brown 1980) and submitted to XRD between 2u and 45u 2h. The data were analyzed in a semi-quantitative way following Cook et al (1975). The intensity of the 3.39-Å , 3.03-Å , and 3.00-Å peaks were used to estimate the mineral fractions of aragonite, lowmagnesium (Mg) calcite (LMC), and high-magnesium calcite (HMC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten powdered sediment samples from each site were mounted as unoriented powder by the backside method (Brindley and Brown 1980) and submitted to XRD between 2u and 45u 2h. The data were analyzed in a semi-quantitative way following Cook et al (1975). The intensity of the 3.39-Å , 3.03-Å , and 3.00-Å peaks were used to estimate the mineral fractions of aragonite, lowmagnesium (Mg) calcite (LMC), and high-magnesium calcite (HMC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation on accuracy is mainly in the use of the weighting factors (derived by Cook, et al, 1975 Strictly speaking, the weighting factors are only valid when used with the X-ray diffraction system for which they were derived. However, due to the similarity of the instruments involved, it was thought that these factors should apply to this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-processing included sieving the previously dried samples using a 30 µm sieve, mixing the sample with 10 mL of ethanol, processing in the micronizer and centrifuge, and drying overnight at 60°C (Cook et al, 1975). After pre-processing, samples were analyzed on the XRD by the Reflective Transmission Spinner with the automatic divergence slit between 4° and 70° scans.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%