1986
DOI: 10.1177/014233128600800403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of quantitative validation for dynamic simulation models

Abstract: The paper presents a number of techniques developed at AEE Winfrith for assessing and improving dynamic simulation models. A method for selecting best-fit parameters for control engineering applications is discussed first. Then, in the main body of the report, the concept of model-distortion is developed, whereby a model's validity may be assessed quantitatively by the extent of time-variation or distortion needed in its nominally constant parameters to match a recorded transient perfectly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This obviously depends on the number of parameters and data points, and the choice of significance level for F. Table 1 shows values for a for a selection of circumstances. Given the approximations made in the evaluation of a by Butterfield and Thomas [3] and the uncertainties in the choice of p and q in the Table, this range is not at odds with Butterfield's suggested value of a % 0.8. 3 AN EXAMPLE…”
Section: 2 Comparison With the Criterion Of Buttefield And Thomasmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This obviously depends on the number of parameters and data points, and the choice of significance level for F. Table 1 shows values for a for a selection of circumstances. Given the approximations made in the evaluation of a by Butterfield and Thomas [3] and the uncertainties in the choice of p and q in the Table, this range is not at odds with Butterfield's suggested value of a % 0.8. 3 AN EXAMPLE…”
Section: 2 Comparison With the Criterion Of Buttefield And Thomasmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The statistics of these distortions can be examined to see how they compare with a priori estimates of their variability. Butterfield [3] suggests two methods of comparison: 0 comparison against known uncertainties such as manufacturing tolerances;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader interested in mathematical and in silico models that are quantitatively in agreement with biological data and based on a similar framework of the kinetic theory for active particles, is referred [10,27]. It is worth stressing that the validation and tuning with data is still a very hard problem and new effective methods or the proper combination of existing methods (see [3,15]) should be developed to reach this goal.…”
Section: Critical Analysis and Research Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So proving the correctness of a model is a matter of importance. If we now interpret -as did Butterfield in [55] -a model as a scientific theory, then the validation of the model must be placed within narrow boundaries. According to Popper [338] the following is true for the validation of a theory:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%