Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface 1999
DOI: 10.1201/9781420073560.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of Evaluation for Bone Dimensions, Densities, Contents, Morphology, and Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some of the equations (Carter and Hayes, 1977;Lotz et al, 1990Lotz et al, , 1991Morgan et al, 2003;Snyder and Schneider, 1991;Wirtz et al, 2000), r ash (ash density) had to be converted to r app (apparent density) for the relationship to be applied. The r ash /r app ratio was assumed to be 0.6 An et al, 2000). The Carter and Hayes (1977) equation was implemented using an assumed physiological strain rate of 0.01, in accordance to previous studies (Keyak et al, 1994;Weinans et al, 2000).…”
Section: Subject-specific Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some of the equations (Carter and Hayes, 1977;Lotz et al, 1990Lotz et al, , 1991Morgan et al, 2003;Snyder and Schneider, 1991;Wirtz et al, 2000), r ash (ash density) had to be converted to r app (apparent density) for the relationship to be applied. The r ash /r app ratio was assumed to be 0.6 An et al, 2000). The Carter and Hayes (1977) equation was implemented using an assumed physiological strain rate of 0.01, in accordance to previous studies (Keyak et al, 1994;Weinans et al, 2000).…”
Section: Subject-specific Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%