Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of Evading Detection by a Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Network under Special Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these techniques were tested with nuclear explosions by the Soviets, and have been described as methods of evading detection under the CTBT [Spivak, 1995], although none have been validated with respect to their effect on seismic monitoring. Also described is the use of Carbon as a heat sink in cavities to enhance decoupling, and replacing the air in cavities with hydrogen or helium has also been proposed to extend the radiation phase of the fireball growth, thus allowing less energy to go into shock motion.…”
Section: Decoupling In Non-spherical Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these techniques were tested with nuclear explosions by the Soviets, and have been described as methods of evading detection under the CTBT [Spivak, 1995], although none have been validated with respect to their effect on seismic monitoring. Also described is the use of Carbon as a heat sink in cavities to enhance decoupling, and replacing the air in cavities with hydrogen or helium has also been proposed to extend the radiation phase of the fireball growth, thus allowing less energy to go into shock motion.…”
Section: Decoupling In Non-spherical Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%