1961
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1961.tb00789.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of Characterizing Missouri River Organic Materials of Taste and Odor Interest

Abstract: A study on the importance of the presence of taste‐ and odor‐causing materials in the Missouri River was recognized by representatives of industries and municipalities, resulting in the formation of the Missouri River Pollution Monitoring Committee. This committee furnished materials of taste and odor significance for study in the sanitary engineering laboratories of Washington University in St. Louis. The study of these organic materials of taste and odor significance is presented in this article, including s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane filtration technique was not selected for this study because of the cost of the large number of filters required and the complex operation of the equipment. The various cartridge types of filters investigated did not give a satisfactory separation because ity characteristics, so that the water could be sampled in its natural state except for the absence of particulate matter; (3) add no additional organic material to the water; (4) operate at an approximate rate of 1 cfm; (5) separate the particulate matter so that it could be dried and extracted and, thus, the nature of the associated organic refractories established; and (6) be easy to operate and moderate in construction cost. The kinds of filtration equipment investigated for use in the removal of the particulate matter from the river water were: membrane filters the pore opening was too large.…”
Section: Studies Of Pretreatment Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane filtration technique was not selected for this study because of the cost of the large number of filters required and the complex operation of the equipment. The various cartridge types of filters investigated did not give a satisfactory separation because ity characteristics, so that the water could be sampled in its natural state except for the absence of particulate matter; (3) add no additional organic material to the water; (4) operate at an approximate rate of 1 cfm; (5) separate the particulate matter so that it could be dried and extracted and, thus, the nature of the associated organic refractories established; and (6) be easy to operate and moderate in construction cost. The kinds of filtration equipment investigated for use in the removal of the particulate matter from the river water were: membrane filters the pore opening was too large.…”
Section: Studies Of Pretreatment Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A carbon dose of 83 ppm reduced the threshold odor from 60 to 14. An average permanganate concentration of 10 ppm, however, in conjunction with SO ppm of carbon, reduced threshold odors from a 400-2,000 initial range to values of [3][4][5] during times of high-odor problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%