2018 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Stream Mining &Amp; Processing (DSMP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/dsmp.2018.8478500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of Building Intelligent Decision Support Systems Based on Adaptive Ontology

Abstract: The approach to the development of intelligent decision support systems using ontology knowledge bases consisting of such systems in the article is considered. The classification of such systems in terms of their operation based on ontologies is carried out. The mathematical functioning of intelligent decision support systems and intelligent search system based on ontology is developed. The notion of adaptive ontologies is introduced. An adaptive ontology is proposed to define as an ontology with concepts and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference of analytical search engines as offered system from simple search engines is in the query view representation and ranging of the found resources taking into account a context of the chosen subject domain [9][10][11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference of analytical search engines as offered system from simple search engines is in the query view representation and ranging of the found resources taking into account a context of the chosen subject domain [9][10][11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developers of the system Hyred, in order to eliminate such a problem, combined a modified Pearson correlation for CF with the boundary distance CBF [58]. That is, they find the nearest and far neighbors of each user to reduce the data set [59]. Using a compressed data set improves scalability, reduces sparsity and the computation cost for the system [60].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the frequency criterion is supplemented by the subject-matter criterion [3]. The formula to establish the synonymy degree (semantic proximity) of words [63]: C=2c/(n 1 +n 2 ), where n 1 is the number of meanings of the first word, n 2 is the number of meanings of the second word, c is the number of common meanings in the given pair of words. Quantitative characteristics of the syntactic constructions also depend on a functional style: simple uncomplicated, even incomplete and broken sentences prevail in the colloquial everyday style, while composite sentences, complicated by constructions, parentheses and inserted structures dominate in the official style [64].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%