2017
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20171700080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods of assessment of stormwater sediments quality

Abstract: Abstract. Concentration of heavy metal (cadmium, copper, chromium, nickel, lead and zinc) in sediments collected from the stormwater treatment plant located in the urbanised catchment were investigated using geoaccumulation index and enrichment factor to determine metal accumulation and pollution status. Total metal concentrations varied widely in studied materials and the mean values were higher than their background values. The I geo results indicate that tested sediments were uncontaminated with respect to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last of these locations, Orłowska tank situated close to the Oliwski Stream estuary, was characterized by extremely high Cu concentration reaching 1114 mg/kg d.w. (at the IN site). The Cu concentration at Orłowska IN was clearly higher than those reported in literature-in the range from 16 times more (sediments in open reservoir in Kielce, Poland [49] to 166 times more than sediments in retention pond in Puławy, Poland [17]. In the study conducted by Nowell et al [48] not only the mean HM concentrations for USA bottom sediments but also the highest values were reported.…”
Section: The Watershed Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The last of these locations, Orłowska tank situated close to the Oliwski Stream estuary, was characterized by extremely high Cu concentration reaching 1114 mg/kg d.w. (at the IN site). The Cu concentration at Orłowska IN was clearly higher than those reported in literature-in the range from 16 times more (sediments in open reservoir in Kielce, Poland [49] to 166 times more than sediments in retention pond in Puławy, Poland [17]. In the study conducted by Nowell et al [48] not only the mean HM concentrations for USA bottom sediments but also the highest values were reported.…”
Section: The Watershed Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The enrichment factor (EF) helps to establish the source of HMs: natural or anthropogenic, normalizing the HM concentration with a reference element such as aluminium (Al). 11,19,21,41 For the normalization, the Al concentration measured in each sample and Al B n concentration in soils reported by Rauch and Pacyna 40 were used.…”
Section: Geochemical Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EF for each trace metal could be categorized into five levels of pollution. EF < 2 represents zero or minimal enrichment, suggestive of zero or minimal pollution; 2 ≤ EF < 5 indicates moderate pollution; 5 ≤ EF < 20 indicates significant pollution; 20 ≤ EF < 40 indicates strong pollution; and EF ≥ 40 indicates extreme pollution [23].…”
Section: Data Evaluation 231 Contamination and Enrichment Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%