Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children

Abstract

Introduction. Research and clinical settings use the 10-meter walk test (10MWT) to measure locomotor capacity with considerable methodological diversity. Comparison between healthy and disabled children is frequent; however, the reproducibility of 10MWT using different methods is unknown. Objectives. This study analysed intrasubject, test-retest reliability, and agreement of four methods of 10MWT, exploring the influence of pace, acceleration-deceleration phases, and anthropometric measurements when calculating mean velocity. Methods. This cross-sectional study evaluated 120 typical children, both sexes, aged 6, 8, 10, and 12 (n=30 for each age). The mean times and velocities of the path (10 m) and middle path (6 m) obtained at a self-selected and fast pace were analysed. Initial assessment and another after seven days recorded three measurements per method (sV6 = self-selected pace and 6 m; sV10 = self-selected pace and 10 m; fV6 = fast pace and 6 m; fV10 = fast pace and 10 m). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), multiple regression, and Snedecor-F test (5% significance level) were used. Results. The fV10 method had high intrasubject reliability for all tested ages (0.70<ICC>0.89); sV10 exhibited high intrasubject reliability for ages 6, 8, and 12 (0.70<ICC>0.89) and moderate for age 10 (0.50<ICC<0.69).Test-retest reliability at sV6 and fV6 did not reach high ICC in any tested ages. The test-retest reliability at sV10 and fV10 was moderate for ages 6, 8, and 12 (0.50<ICC>0.69) and poor for age 10 (0.25<ICC>0.49). There was no agreement between methods: sV6 versus sV10 (mean difference=0.91 m/s; SEM=0.036); fV6 versus fV10 (mean difference=1.70; SEM=0.046). The fV6 method versus fV10 overestimated the velocity (bias=1.70 m/s). Conclusions. For typical children, the method that ensured the highest intrasubject reliability used fast pace and 10 m. Moreover, test-retest reliability increased when adopting 10 m at both self-selected and fast pace. The methods were not equivalent but were related, and those that did not compute the entire pathway overestimated the results.

Equilibrium coordination tests among children: A feasibility study

“…significant difference was found between the values of 6 minute walk test and the sex of the children of age group 6-12 years of which supports the result of the present study [31]. Another study also declared that there was no significant difference between the normative values obtained for male and female healthy children performing 10 meter walk test [32]. This showed that the result of the present study was in line with that of the available literature.…”

Normative reference values for Obstacles Test and Curb Test and their correlation with demographic characteristics: a cross-sectional study in Saudi children

“…Therefore, in this study, the Obstacles Test and Curb Test were performed with instructions to proceed at a fast speed. Implementing walking at fast speeds, as used in this study, is consistent with established timed walking tests (10 MWT, MTUG, and Timed Up and Down Stairs), which are more appropriate when performed at a fast speed [11,[30][31][32][33][34][35].…”

The effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation on improvement of daily living activities in children with cerebral palsy: narrative review

“… Children with ambulatory CP 4 - 16 years Concurrent validity Excellent test-retest reliabilityICC=0.94 McDowell et al [ 28 ], Martakis et al [ 29 ] 10-Meter Walk Test Measure locomotor capacity in clinical and research settings. Children and adolescents with neurological dysfunction 2 - 12 years High validity in the neurological diseases Good reliability0:70 < ICC > 0:89 de Baptista et al [ 30 ] 30-s chair rise The 30-Second Chair Test is administered using a chair without arms, with height of 43.2 cm. The chair, with rubber tips on the legs, is placed against a wall to prevent it from moving.…”