2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.23.481628
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods in Cognitive Pupillometry: Design, Preprocessing, and Statistical Analysis

Abstract: Cognitive pupillometry is the measurement of pupil size to investigate cognitive processes such as attention, mental effort, working memory, and many others. Currently, there is no commonly agreed-upon methodology for conducting cognitive-pupillometry experiments, and approaches vary widely between research groups and even between different experiments from the same group. This lack of consensus makes it difficult to know which factors to consider when conducting a cognitive-pupillometry experiment. Here we pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We ran a four-fold cross-validation analysis on a predetermined time-window of 750-3000 ms after the onset of the cue to assess differences in pupil size across eccentricities. This procedure is described in more detail in Mathôt and Vilotijević (2022); however, in brief, this analysis determines a time point at which an effect of interest (Cue Eccentricity in our case) is strongest by splitting the data into training and test sets. Next, for each test set, the corresponding training set is used to determine the time point at which the effect is the strongest; a single linear mixed effects (LME) analysis is then conducted for the full dataset, using for each test set the time point that was selected based on the corresponding training set, thus avoiding both circularity and the need to correct for multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We ran a four-fold cross-validation analysis on a predetermined time-window of 750-3000 ms after the onset of the cue to assess differences in pupil size across eccentricities. This procedure is described in more detail in Mathôt and Vilotijević (2022); however, in brief, this analysis determines a time point at which an effect of interest (Cue Eccentricity in our case) is strongest by splitting the data into training and test sets. Next, for each test set, the corresponding training set is used to determine the time point at which the effect is the strongest; a single linear mixed effects (LME) analysis is then conducted for the full dataset, using for each test set the time point that was selected based on the corresponding training set, thus avoiding both circularity and the need to correct for multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the workflow for preprocessing pupillary data that we described elsewhere (Mathôt & Vilotijević, 2022), we first interpolated blinks and downsampled the data by a factor of 10. Also, we converted pupil size measurements from arbitrary units to millimeters of diameter by using the formula specific to our lab (Wilschut & Mathôt, 2022).…”
Section: Pupillary Data: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the exclusion criteria defined in the preregistration, two participants were initially excluded because their accuracies for question 1 (Target search task) were below 80%. However, in deviation from the preregistration, we updated our analysis pathway to use a new, improved blink-reconstruction algorithm and to exclude trials based on deviant baseline pupil sizes (Mathôt & Vilotijević, 2022); after this update, one participant reached 80% for question 1 and was included again. Therefore, 26 participants were included in the final analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right and left eye data were treated separately then averaged. To account for fluctuations in arousal and tonic pupil changes, we performed a baseline correction, as recommended by Mathôt and Vilotijević [45]. Baselining was achieved by subtracting the baseline pupil size, taken from a 200ms window before stimulus onset (as in [17]), from the peak pupil response over a 3000ms window on each trial (see Figure 2C).…”
Section: Pupil Dilationmentioning
confidence: 99%