1993
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(93)85003-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for vapour cloud explosion blast modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if this effect has already corrected in the TNT curve used to determine P [8], this correction is not required.…”
Section: Overpressure As a Function Of Sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if this effect has already corrected in the TNT curve used to determine P [8], this correction is not required.…”
Section: Overpressure As a Function Of Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak overpressure was obtained from the plot of P versus d n [8]. The P was calculated for the following situations: liquid mass = 100 kg, d = 50 m, and liquid mass = 10,000 kg and d = 50 m (Fig.…”
Section: Overpressure As a Function Of Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the literature does not disclose a detailed description of the TNO values 31,32 . The curve of the CFX simulation data seems to follow between levels 5 and 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a QRA generally requires simplifying assumptions both for the time evolution of the accidental phenomena and the consequence evaluation. An almost universal hypothesis used in QRA to model the consequences of explosions is to assume that all the accidental phenomena previously described produce blast waves which can be idealised and compared to the ideal blast wave produced by an equivalent charge of one or more solid "point" explosions (TNT, Baker-Strehlow and Multi-Energy methods) [21][22][23]. By these methods, peak overpressure P • and impulse I • can be easily determined.…”
Section: Simplifying Assumptions In the Framework Of Quantitative Rismentioning
confidence: 99%